<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruminations on Self-examination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/</link>
	<description>Software development, testing, and techie life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry MacLean</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry MacLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 13:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-299</guid>
		<description>While I don&#039;t necessarily agree with Kalpesh that &quot;every religion (christianity, islam, hinduism) is a set of refinements/rules added over the passage of time to the group&#039;s own needs&quot;, I do think that people use religion to try and get closer to the truth.  One thing that most religions try to sell is that they are the one path to the truth - and any of us that have settled on one faith believe that of their chosen faith.

Another interesting take is that we spend far too much time looking in other people&#039;s pools instead of our own, and even imposing our desired self-image on them.  Is this because it is so difficult for us to make modifications in ourselves once we see our true reflection?

I love this type of post, Chad.  How we approach life&#039;s problems can reflect positively on how we do our jobs, and how we approach our work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with Kalpesh that &#8220;every religion (christianity, islam, hinduism) is a set of refinements/rules added over the passage of time to the group&#8217;s own needs&#8221;, I do think that people use religion to try and get closer to the truth.  One thing that most religions try to sell is that they are the one path to the truth &#8211; and any of us that have settled on one faith believe that of their chosen faith.</p>
<p>Another interesting take is that we spend far too much time looking in other people&#8217;s pools instead of our own, and even imposing our desired self-image on them.  Is this because it is so difficult for us to make modifications in ourselves once we see our true reflection?</p>
<p>I love this type of post, Chad.  How we approach life&#8217;s problems can reflect positively on how we do our jobs, and how we approach our work. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Chambers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Agreed! =)

Now if only the few can generate enough positive feelings to influence the many we&#039;ll be in good shape =)

Most people have a negative outlook but no matter the circumstance or scenario it is always better to look at the greener side =) Easier said than done though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed! =)</p>
<p>Now if only the few can generate enough positive feelings to influence the many we&#8217;ll be in good shape =)</p>
<p>Most people have a negative outlook but no matter the circumstance or scenario it is always better to look at the greener side =) Easier said than done though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalpesh</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalpesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Good ideas do not belong to any &quot;religion&quot;. They are universal in nature.

And every religion (christianity, islam, hinduism) is a set of refinements/rules added over the passage of time to the group&#039;s own needs.

The word religion is a limited thing in itself. Dharma is what I can think of - is universal as human beings, irrespective of whether someone is a christian, muslim or a buddhist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ideas do not belong to any &#8220;religion&#8221;. They are universal in nature.</p>
<p>And every religion (christianity, islam, hinduism) is a set of refinements/rules added over the passage of time to the group&#8217;s own needs.</p>
<p>The word religion is a limited thing in itself. Dharma is what I can think of &#8211; is universal as human beings, irrespective of whether someone is a christian, muslim or a buddhist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Myers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-296</guid>
		<description>@Sean:

Not at all. This wasn&#039;t about religion in the first place, really. So other viewpoints/takes on the subject -- including/especially those from other traditions -- are certainly welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sean:</p>
<p>Not at all. This wasn&#8217;t about religion in the first place, really. So other viewpoints/takes on the subject &#8212; including/especially those from other traditions &#8212; are certainly welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Chambers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 12:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-295</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. Definately a good conversation piece.

To add to your points, As you stated, the Buddha also noticed that all things are impermanent in life. Everything is constantly changing and nothing ever lasts. Especially Money, Possesions, Fame and Power.

In this day and age, in most developed countries it is extremely difficult for people to grasp this concept, however once one understands that possesions mean nothing and never lasts, is the only time when you can contemplate the true nature of the world and gain the knowledge and wisdom that one attains from listening to one&#039;s inner-self, or self-examination as you noted. This is no easy task however. Most people are so used to listening to their own Ego, that listening to something deeper takes practice and paitence but once we are able to do so, we gain lifetimes of wisdom in a very short time of bathing in the third pool.

Hope I didn&#039;t impose, just noting the Buddhist view =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. Definately a good conversation piece.</p>
<p>To add to your points, As you stated, the Buddha also noticed that all things are impermanent in life. Everything is constantly changing and nothing ever lasts. Especially Money, Possesions, Fame and Power.</p>
<p>In this day and age, in most developed countries it is extremely difficult for people to grasp this concept, however once one understands that possesions mean nothing and never lasts, is the only time when you can contemplate the true nature of the world and gain the knowledge and wisdom that one attains from listening to one&#8217;s inner-self, or self-examination as you noted. This is no easy task however. Most people are so used to listening to their own Ego, that listening to something deeper takes practice and paitence but once we are able to do so, we gain lifetimes of wisdom in a very short time of bathing in the third pool.</p>
<p>Hope I didn&#8217;t impose, just noting the Buddhist view =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Greer</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-294</guid>
		<description>I would set forth that while the concluding sentiment may be true, that &quot;the only thing we truly posses in this world is our own will&quot;, the ability for mankind to alter this will is a sentiment not universally held as can be seen in Luther&#039;s &quot;Bondage of the Will&#039;, Edward&#039;s &quot;The Freedom of the Will&quot;, and Schopenhauer&#039;s &quot;On the Freedom of the Will&quot;.  Perhaps people stare in the first two ponds more often because it is only there that they have the ability to alter what they see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would set forth that while the concluding sentiment may be true, that &#8220;the only thing we truly posses in this world is our own will&#8221;, the ability for mankind to alter this will is a sentiment not universally held as can be seen in Luther&#8217;s &#8220;Bondage of the Will&#8217;, Edward&#8217;s &#8220;The Freedom of the Will&#8221;, and Schopenhauer&#8217;s &#8220;On the Freedom of the Will&#8221;.  Perhaps people stare in the first two ponds more often because it is only there that they have the ability to alter what they see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Myers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-293</guid>
		<description>@Jan:  Fixed. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jan:  Fixed. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Van Ryswyck</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2008/05/25/ruminations-on-self-examination/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Van Ryswyck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2008/05/24/ruminations-on-self-examination.aspx#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Catholic University of Lueven in Belgium -&gt; Lueven should actually be spelled Leuven. Just me nitpicking ;-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catholic University of Lueven in Belgium -> Lueven should actually be spelled Leuven. Just me nitpicking ;-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
