<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the performance of “Opinionated Builders”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2009/06/14/on-the-performance-of-opinionated-builders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2009/06/14/on-the-performance-of-opinionated-builders/</link>
	<description>Software development, testing, and techie life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: benhyrman</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/chadmyers/2009/06/14/on-the-performance-of-opinionated-builders/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>benhyrman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/chad_myers/archive/2009/06/14/on-the-performance-of-opinionated-builders.aspx#comment-998</guid>
		<description>The problem with getting hung up on the performance of those input builders is that one would have to written an app:

 -  that is data-entry intensive
 - where the biggest performance issue is partial views
 - and is only using partial views in relation to the input builders
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with getting hung up on the performance of those input builders is that one would have to written an app:</p>
<p> &#8211;  that is data-entry intensive<br />
 &#8211; where the biggest performance issue is partial views<br />
 &#8211; and is only using partial views in relation to the input builders</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
