<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Castle MicroKernel Fluent Event Wiring</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:01:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Mead</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Mead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Nevermind... reading the referenced &quot;forgottenskies&quot; link: :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevermind&#8230; reading the referenced &#8220;forgottenskies&#8221; link: <img src='http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Mead</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Mead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Or is the Subscriber-&gt;SubscriberInfo  relationship &quot;grease&quot; for the extension method/ linq usage? Like a thin object graph

i.e. Child.ForName(&quot;subscriber&quot;)  roughly equates to &quot;give me child of the one named subscriber (SubscriberInfo?)

Are Child.ForName, .Eq, Attrib.ForName MicroKernel Registration API extension methods?

Sorry about the dumb questions. I am deciding on IoC containers and evaluating code-based configuration paradigms. I think I understand how to leverage your approach on down the road - I thought I might as well poke the unknowns. I am also a little linq-naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or is the Subscriber->SubscriberInfo  relationship &#8220;grease&#8221; for the extension method/ linq usage? Like a thin object graph</p>
<p>i.e. Child.ForName(&#8220;subscriber&#8221;)  roughly equates to &#8220;give me child of the one named subscriber (SubscriberInfo?)</p>
<p>Are Child.ForName, .Eq, Attrib.ForName MicroKernel Registration API extension methods?</p>
<p>Sorry about the dumb questions. I am deciding on IoC containers and evaluating code-based configuration paradigms. I think I understand how to leverage your approach on down the road &#8211; I thought I might as well poke the unknowns. I am also a little linq-naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Mead</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Mead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-82</guid>
		<description>OT: @Colin 

Just few a questions in regard to the class encapsulation where Subscriber encapsulates SubscriberInfo. I typically warn myself off of usage like this because I don&#039;t understand the qualities. 

Is this implementation: 
a) a pattern of which I am unaware 
b) Does it afford quality to the container or the fluency framework? 
c)?


Thanks, Brad 

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT: @Colin </p>
<p>Just few a questions in regard to the class encapsulation where Subscriber encapsulates SubscriberInfo. I typically warn myself off of usage like this because I don&#8217;t understand the qualities. </p>
<p>Is this implementation:<br />
a) a pattern of which I am unaware<br />
b) Does it afford quality to the container or the fluency framework?<br />
c)?</p>
<p>Thanks, Brad </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuna Toksoz</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuna Toksoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-81</guid>
		<description>i am just trying some tricks, 

Component.For&lt;IService&gt;()
.ImplementedBy&lt;PublisherService&gt;()	.Subscribers(Subscriber.ForComponent&lt;PublisherService,SubscriberService&gt;(&quot;subscriberId&quot;,(x, y) =&gt; x.ServiceStarted += y.Subscriber));

This is possible since I&#039;m using lambda&#039;s as delegates. I think i can process it to get the right stuff: which subscribed to what but this ForComponent&lt;Pub,Sub&gt; part disturbs me as it is not necessary.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am just trying some tricks, </p>
<p>Component.For<iservice>()<br />
.ImplementedBy
<publisherservice>()	.Subscribers(Subscriber.ForComponent</publisherservice>
<publisherservice ,SubscriberService>(&#8220;subscriberId&#8221;,(x, y) => x.ServiceStarted += y.Subscriber));</p>
<p>This is possible since I&#8217;m using lambda&#8217;s as delegates. I think i can process it to get the right stuff: which subscribed to what but this ForComponent
<pub ,Sub> part disturbs me as it is not necessary.
</pub></publisherservice></iservice></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cramsay</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>cramsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Valeriu, I agree but as Tuna has mentioned I&#039;m not sure if that would be possible in this context. If someone can point us in the right direction....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valeriu, I agree but as Tuna has mentioned I&#8217;m not sure if that would be possible in this context. If someone can point us in the right direction&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuna Toksoz</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuna Toksoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-79</guid>
		<description>There is one thing that I forgot about: events can only be used on the left of += operator and unfortunately an assignment operator cannot be part of an expresssion. Agh!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one thing that I forgot about: events can only be used on the left of += operator and unfortunately an assignment operator cannot be part of an expresssion. Agh!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valeriu Caraulean</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Valeriu Caraulean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Will be nice to get rid of all &quot;magic&quot; strings.
Try add expressions and static reflection, it may be better...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be nice to get rid of all &#8220;magic&#8221; strings.<br />
Try add expressions and static reflection, it may be better&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuna Toksoz</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/colinramsay/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuna Toksoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/colin_ramsay/archive/2009/01/25/castle-microkernel-fluent-event-wiring.aspx#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I guess I can take i one step further with more lambdas. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I can take i one step further with more lambdas. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
