<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Distilling the Law of Demeter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2008/06/10/distilling-law-of-demeter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2008/06/10/distilling-law-of-demeter/</link>
	<description>pursuing well-crafted software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2008/06/10/distilling-law-of-demeter/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 03:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2008/06/distilling-the-law-of-demeter/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that Law of Demeter is not appropriate in every case. 

There&#039;s similar idea between Law of Demeter and DDD aggregation root. Both aim at seting a clean subsystem boundary and low coupling. But, in real domain model, it does not always form a functional hierarchy structure like a car, for example, Company can&#039;t encapsulate CEO, CTO, just like the example of Heart and Patient in your article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that Law of Demeter is not appropriate in every case. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s similar idea between Law of Demeter and DDD aggregation root. Both aim at seting a clean subsystem boundary and low coupling. But, in real domain model, it does not always form a functional hierarchy structure like a car, for example, Company can&#8217;t encapsulate CEO, CTO, just like the example of Heart and Patient in your article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epileptikitty</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2008/06/10/distilling-law-of-demeter/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>epileptikitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2008/06/distilling-the-law-of-demeter/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Hear, hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2008/06/10/distilling-law-of-demeter/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringcraftsman.com/2008/06/distilling-the-law-of-demeter/#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t really anything intelligent to add. Just wanted to forward my appreciation. This article, the separation of conscerns and MVP/MVC are among the best articles I&#039;ve read on the net.Thanks and keep upp the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t really anything intelligent to add. Just wanted to forward my appreciation. This article, the separation of conscerns and MVP/MVC are among the best articles I&#8217;ve read on the net.Thanks and keep upp the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
