<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Effective Tests: A Test-First Example &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/</link>
	<description>pursuing well-crafted software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDD and BDD test-first development series - Remondo</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>TDD and BDD test-first development series - Remondo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] Effective Tests: A Test-First Example – Part 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Effective Tests: A Test-First Example – Part 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon van Bokhorst</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon van Bokhorst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Great series! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great series! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GC</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>GC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DotNetShoutout</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>DotNetShoutout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-61</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Effective Tests: A Test-First Example – Part 1 - Derek Greer...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Effective Tests: A Test-First Example – Part 1 &#8211; Derek Greer&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for submitting this cool story &#8211; Trackback from DotNetShoutout&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Greer</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never used the [TestCase] attributes before, but this certainly would be a way of achieving triangulation for data-centric generalization concerns.  This wouldn&#039;t work for all cases though.  In some cases, you may need to triangulate behavior based upon a different sequences of actions altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never used the [TestCase] attributes before, but this certainly would be a way of achieving triangulation for data-centric generalization concerns.  This wouldn&#8217;t work for all cases though.  In some cases, you may need to triangulate behavior based upon a different sequences of actions altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Greer</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Those were originally &#039;&#039;, but Wordpress seems to be stripping them out.  I imagine that would have been a little confusing.  The source should look correct now.  Thanks for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those were originally &#8221;, but WordPress seems to be stripping them out.  I imagine that would have been a little confusing.  The source should look correct now.  Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Steinhilber</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Steinhilber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Do you think that you could use NUnit&#039;s [TestCase] or [TestCaseSource] attributes to facilitate triangulation? That way you could specify a single test but with multiple inputs that would show the generalized behavior. I don&#039;t know if other testing frameworks have something similar, but it might help to avoid the additional test that doesn&#039;t add anything meaningful beyond highlighting a needed generalization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that you could use NUnit&#8217;s [TestCase] or [TestCaseSource] attributes to facilitate triangulation? That way you could specify a single test but with multiple inputs that would show the generalized behavior. I don&#8217;t know if other testing frameworks have something similar, but it might help to avoid the additional test that doesn&#8217;t add anything meaningful beyond highlighting a needed generalization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Great post, I&#039;ve been looking for something like this to go in-depth through the process of creating (semi) real-world code, rather than the FizzBuzz examples that are out there that don&#039;t show anything useful.

One question though, I was a bit thrown by the empty char literals (&#039;&#039;) - did you intend these to be a space char (&#039; &#039;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, I&#8217;ve been looking for something like this to go in-depth through the process of creating (semi) real-world code, rather than the FizzBuzz examples that are out there that don&#8217;t show anything useful.</p>
<p>One question though, I was a bit thrown by the empty char literals (&#8221;) &#8211; did you intend these to be a space char (&#8216; &#8216;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Greer</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Greer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-56</guid>
		<description>The word &quot;It&quot; refers to the System Under Test (SUT) and is a common concept across several frameworks (e.g. RSpec, MSpec, others?).  This probably does seem less clear in this context given we have the freedom to specify the SUT explicitly, but I&#039;ve chosen to use it here for style uniformity with an upcoming article in this series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;It&#8221; refers to the System Under Test (SUT) and is a common concept across several frameworks (e.g. RSpec, MSpec, others?).  This probably does seem less clear in this context given we have the freedom to specify the SUT explicitly, but I&#8217;ve chosen to use it here for style uniformity with an upcoming article in this series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Effective Tests: How Faking It Can Help You</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/03/28/effective-tests-a-test-first-example-part-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Effective Tests: How Faking It Can Help You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 17:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=169#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] part 4 of our series, I presented a Test-Driven Development primer before beginning our exercise.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part 4 of our series, I presented a Test-Driven Development primer before beginning our exercise.&#160; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
