Comments on: Cohesion and Controller Ontology http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/05/31/cohesion-and-controller-ontology/ pursuing well-crafted software Tue, 14 May 2013 13:08:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Derek Greer http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/05/31/cohesion-and-controller-ontology/#comment-212 Derek Greer Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:38:00 +0000 http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=467#comment-212 I wouldn't say the role of the controller is fundamentally at odds with object-oriented design, but I agree that functions would serve as a good representation as the SRP begins to drive the design toward discrete actions. I wouldn’t say the role of the controller is fundamentally at odds with object-oriented design, but I agree that functions would serve as a good representation as the SRP begins to drive the design toward discrete actions.

]]> By: John Teague http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/05/31/cohesion-and-controller-ontology/#comment-211 John Teague Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:12:00 +0000 http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=467#comment-211 this was probably more relative to your other post, but oh well ;) Because we only have classes at our disposal in C#, you are applying concepts related to object design to something that in reality isn't really object oriented. Actions are a just functions, and if we had free functions if c# that would be the better representation.  this was probably more relative to your other post, but oh well ;)

Because we only have classes at our disposal in C#, you are applying concepts related to object design to something that in reality isn’t really object oriented.

Actions are a just functions, and if we had free functions if c# that would be the better representation. 

]]> By: The Morning Brew - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #863 http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/05/31/cohesion-and-controller-ontology/#comment-210 The Morning Brew - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #863 Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:32:48 +0000 http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=467#comment-210 [...] Cohesion and Controller Ontology - Derek Greer follows on from his recent article on Single Action Controllers in ASP.NET MVC discussing how the principles of Cohesion, Role Stereotypes and the Single Responsibility Principle support this design decision. [...] [...] Cohesion and Controller Ontology – Derek Greer follows on from his recent article on Single Action Controllers in ASP.NET MVC discussing how the principles of Cohesion, Role Stereotypes and the Single Responsibility Principle support this design decision. [...]

]]> By: Derek Greer http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/05/31/cohesion-and-controller-ontology/#comment-208 Derek Greer Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:00:00 +0000 http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=467#comment-208 I'm not exactly sure.  I might explore the idea of representing actions with such a construct if it were available, but ultimately I'd probably base my decision upon what extent it had on the fluidity, expressiveness and maintainability of the code. I’m not exactly sure.  I might explore the idea of representing actions with such a construct if it were available, but ultimately I’d probably base my decision upon what extent it had on the fluidity, expressiveness and maintainability of the code.

]]> By: John Teague http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/2011/05/31/cohesion-and-controller-ontology/#comment-207 John Teague Tue, 31 May 2011 17:27:00 +0000 http://lostechies.com/derekgreer/?p=467#comment-207 If C# had "free" methods, like JavaScript, F#, etc..  Would you use a class to describe a route action? If C# had “free” methods, like JavaScript, F#, etc..  Would you use a class to describe a route action?

]]>