<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Write Automated Tests For My Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code/</link>
	<description>Better Than Yesterday</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 03:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sonmez</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sonmez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/derickbailey/archive/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code.aspx#comment-726</guid>
		<description>I agree with you.  Very good points.  Definitely I concur with the idea of writing specifications.

Another important reason I write automated tests for my code is that it helps me to correctly design me code in a way which is simple and less coupled.  When I start with the unit tests, I am compelled to separate logic into classes in order to make it easier to test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you.  Very good points.  Definitely I concur with the idea of writing specifications.</p>
<p>Another important reason I write automated tests for my code is that it helps me to correctly design me code in a way which is simple and less coupled.  When I start with the unit tests, I am compelled to separate logic into classes in order to make it easier to test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Tuttle</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/derickbailey/archive/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code.aspx#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  I too think in terms of specifications (rather than tests) now.  In fact, I think I&#039;ve come to a full circle of sorts.  

If I find myself writing a test that has no resemblance to any customer requirement, then I know I have more questions for the customer to answer.  

If I find a customer requirement that has no corresponding test in the code, then I know I have more work to do in the test code base.  

I know I&#039;m on track when there are no orphaned tests or requirements.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  I too think in terms of specifications (rather than tests) now.  In fact, I think I&#8217;ve come to a full circle of sorts.  </p>
<p>If I find myself writing a test that has no resemblance to any customer requirement, then I know I have more questions for the customer to answer.  </p>
<p>If I find a customer requirement that has no corresponding test in the code, then I know I have more work to do in the test code base.  </p>
<p>I know I&#8217;m on track when there are no orphaned tests or requirements.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrett Meyer</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrett Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/derickbailey/archive/2010/03/29/why-i-write-automated-tests-for-my-code.aspx#comment-724</guid>
		<description>With any system of any reasonable complexity, it is impossible to manually test every little edge case for every page/form/view/whatever. I am so glad that I&#039;m not the only one in this camp. I, too, write tests because I am not perfect. This is the best post I&#039;ve read in a long time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With any system of any reasonable complexity, it is impossible to manually test every little edge case for every page/form/view/whatever. I am so glad that I&#8217;m not the only one in this camp. I, too, write tests because I am not perfect. This is the best post I&#8217;ve read in a long time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
