http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2011/01/24/asynchronous-control-updates-in-c-net-winforms/ Better Than Yesterday Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:53:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2011/01/24/asynchronous-control-updates-in-c-net-winforms/#comment-3109 brettof86 Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:27:00 +0000 /blogs/derickbailey/archive/2011/01/24/asynchronous-control-updates-in-c-net-winforms.aspx#comment-3109 This is brilliant. Thank you. This is brilliant. Thank you.

]]> http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2011/01/24/asynchronous-control-updates-in-c-net-winforms/#comment-2789 dmboucher Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:52:00 +0000 /blogs/derickbailey/archive/2011/01/24/asynchronous-control-updates-in-c-net-winforms.aspx#comment-2789 Excellent! Many thanks! Works very well! Excellent! Many thanks! Works very well!

]]> http://lostechies.com/derickbailey/2011/01/24/asynchronous-control-updates-in-c-net-winforms/#comment-1372 Harry Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:30:53 +0000 /blogs/derickbailey/archive/2011/01/24/asynchronous-control-updates-in-c-net-winforms.aspx#comment-1372 Why not use the SynchronizationContext instead see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.threading.synchronizationcontext.aspx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.windowsformssynchronizationcontext.aspx Of course, this mean you need to have some kind of member for the context. Since the context needs to be "set" by e.g. the creating gui thread. Why not use the SynchronizationContext instead see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.threading.synchronizationcontext.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.forms.windowsformssynchronizationcontext.aspx
Of course, this mean you need to have some kind of member for the context. Since the context needs to be “set” by e.g. the creating gui thread.

]]>