<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using DB4Objects as a prototyping tool.  Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2008/02/26/using-db4objects-as-a-prototyping-tool-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2008/02/26/using-db4objects-as-a-prototyping-tool-part-i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erichexter</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2008/02/26/using-db4objects-as-a-prototyping-tool-part-i/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>erichexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/hex/archive/2008/02/26/using-db4objects-as-a-prototyping-tool-part-i.aspx#comment-3</guid>
		<description>@Sean  - I am testing this out now and this is the first time I have used it. So far it has less friction than nhibernate, but I have not gotten to the Unit of Work abstraction.  I imagine that is where I will have some debt to pay.

As far as more work, I am not sure I agree with that.  I think this is less work than even say nhibernate.  There are no mappings to create.  There is not database schema to create or push to the different environments. Those things are getting easier to manage, but they take time to get in place and I would personally like to delay that work until after I am demonstrating value in the project. Either way I should be working through these issues in the next few posts and we will see what comes of this crazy idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sean  &#8211; I am testing this out now and this is the first time I have used it. So far it has less friction than nhibernate, but I have not gotten to the Unit of Work abstraction.  I imagine that is where I will have some debt to pay.</p>
<p>As far as more work, I am not sure I agree with that.  I think this is less work than even say nhibernate.  There are no mappings to create.  There is not database schema to create or push to the different environments. Those things are getting easier to manage, but they take time to get in place and I would personally like to delay that work until after I am demonstrating value in the project. Either way I should be working through these issues in the next few posts and we will see what comes of this crazy idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Chambers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2008/02/26/using-db4objects-as-a-prototyping-tool-part-i/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/hex/archive/2008/02/26/using-db4objects-as-a-prototyping-tool-part-i.aspx#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Interesting approach.

Although, This seems like a lot of extra work for prototyping.

I personally just use a generic repository with nhibernate, supplying an alternate config for a sqlce database on test runs. A throw away database if you will. This way all I have to do is create the repository implementation to go to production.

Do you use this a lot or are you testing it out? I would like to know how it works in a real world situation. If it&#039;s not too difficult I would consider giving it a shot myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting approach.</p>
<p>Although, This seems like a lot of extra work for prototyping.</p>
<p>I personally just use a generic repository with nhibernate, supplying an alternate config for a sqlce database on test runs. A throw away database if you will. This way all I have to do is create the repository implementation to go to production.</p>
<p>Do you use this a lot or are you testing it out? I would like to know how it works in a real world situation. If it&#8217;s not too difficult I would consider giving it a shot myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
