Comments on: ASP.Net MVC – MvcContrib – We need your opinion! http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2008/03/30/asp-net-mvc-mvccontrib-we-need-your-opinion/ Tue, 21 May 2013 00:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Roberto Gattinoni http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2008/03/30/asp-net-mvc-mvccontrib-we-need-your-opinion/#comment-9 Roberto Gattinoni Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:00:44 +0000 /blogs/hex/archive/2008/03/30/asp-net-mvc-mvccontrib-we-need-your-opinion.aspx#comment-9 As far as I'm concerned I'd much more prefer something as http://api.rubyonrails.org/ Much more immediate and readable. But this is me. As far as I’m concerned I’d much more prefer something as
http://api.rubyonrails.org/

Much more immediate and readable. But this is me.

]]> By: Sergio Pereira http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2008/03/30/asp-net-mvc-mvccontrib-we-need-your-opinion/#comment-8 Sergio Pereira Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:18:41 +0000 /blogs/hex/archive/2008/03/30/asp-net-mvc-mvccontrib-we-need-your-opinion.aspx#comment-8 I've always thought .chm documentation was easy to be dismissed. Some people go through the great effort of including not only the listings, but also examples and interesting remarks, but people (a.k.a. myself) just don't remember to even check for its existence. In my case, I go directly to the online docs. Heck, I don't even install MSDN docs and the VS help is the first thing I disable. Online all the way but having a local copy of the wiki, like CCNET does, can come in handy. I’ve always thought .chm documentation was easy to be dismissed. Some people go through the great effort of including not only the listings, but also examples and interesting remarks, but people (a.k.a. myself) just don’t remember to even check for its existence.
In my case, I go directly to the online docs. Heck, I don’t even install MSDN docs and the VS help is the first thing I disable.
Online all the way but having a local copy of the wiki, like CCNET does, can come in handy.

]]>