<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alt.Net Seattle Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2009/03/03/alt-net-seattle-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2009/03/03/alt-net-seattle-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: erichexter</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2009/03/03/alt-net-seattle-review/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>erichexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/hex/archive/2009/03/02/alt-net-seattle-review.aspx#comment-84</guid>
		<description>@Aaron  I agree with you about how our Conference to Attendee is currently modeled.  I just recored all the comments as they were given.  We really did not want to get into a DDD debate, I agree with you and the way that it is currently modeled is good from my perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aaron  I agree with you about how our Conference to Attendee is currently modeled.  I just recored all the comments as they were given.  We really did not want to get into a DDD debate, I agree with you and the way that it is currently modeled is good from my perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Jensen</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/erichexter/2009/03/03/alt-net-seattle-review/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/hex/archive/2009/03/02/alt-net-seattle-review.aspx#comment-83</guid>
		<description>re: the Conference domain object, I wasn&#039;t in the session and I haven&#039;t looked at the code, but I&#039;d strongly consider not following the suggestion to just exposing the collection. Exposing a collection as a collection breaks the encapsulation of the aggregate root. Conference.AddAttendees is much more flexible and safe than Conference.Attendees.Add. It&#039;s not a lot more code and it easily allows you to add behavior around adding and removing attendees. For example, how would you handle a conference max attendee limit if you just exposed the collection? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: the Conference domain object, I wasn&#8217;t in the session and I haven&#8217;t looked at the code, but I&#8217;d strongly consider not following the suggestion to just exposing the collection. Exposing a collection as a collection breaks the encapsulation of the aggregate root. Conference.AddAttendees is much more flexible and safe than Conference.Attendees.Add. It&#8217;s not a lot more code and it easily allows you to add behavior around adding and removing attendees. For example, how would you handle a conference max attendee limit if you just exposed the collection? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
