Comments on: Automapper Auto Profile Registration.

By: txvkguusf

txvkguusf — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:27:29 +0000

2lp0WJ nxyxouttyolw, [url=http://ksavcgdtamdh.com/]ksavcgdtamdh[/url], [link=http://metjivcucgmb.com/]metjivcucgmb[/link], http://vfdriybkulua.com/

By: Tyres Dealer

Tyres Dealer — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:18:51 +0000

Great post! I’ve been very interested in Automapper Auto Profile Registration for a long time.

By: Tyres Dealer

Tyres Dealer — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:37:38 +0000

Great post! I’ve been very interested in Automapper Auto Profile Registration for a long time.

By: Ryan Riley

Ryan Riley — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:51:19 +0000

@Eric Sorry, I wasn’t questioning the use of ForEach, which I also use regularly, just the implementation. I probably over-engineered mine; just curious what you thought about the approach.

By: erichexter

erichexter — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:49:18 +0000

@Ryan Honestly I went with the .ForEach extension method because it is already in our project and it reads like a sentence which is a big win, for me.

By: Ryan Riley

Ryan Riley — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:29:26 +0000

After seeing reading a bit about performance differences in foreach over a List and for over an array, I made the following adjustments to my implementation. Obviously, that destroys the lazy loading and enumerates immediately, but I figure you're going to hit that at some point. All that to say, what was your thought behind just using a simple foreach (other than it's simple)? Or was that it? Just curious. Mine is probably overkill. I haven't even tested the performance implications (bad me); just trying stuff out.

By: erichexter

erichexter — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:01:35 +0000

@Craig here are some examples of some mappings with a TypeConverter in Code Camp Server http://bit.ly/4qHEQU

By: Craig Cavalier

Craig Cavalier — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:41:08 +0000

I find posts like this really handy, especially when they are as relevant to me as this one!

I’m also finding my profiles to be a bit unwieldy, however I suspect I’m not using the Custom Type Converters, Custom Value Resolvers, Custom Value Formatters effectively.

I notice you said “handle all of the mappings to and from the domain object”. Do you have two-way mapping then? In the project I am working on, I am attemping Jimmy’s suggestion of mapping EditModel to CommandMessages, but am still ironing out some of the rough edges in my implementation. Do you know if there an example of this in CodeCampServer?

By: Darrell Mozingo

Darrell Mozingo — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:16:23 +0000

Direct and to the point – I like it.

Our profile is growing quite unwieldy too, but we only use it to map domain models to view models, so per-scenario wouldn’t help us much. Per domain object sounds interesting, but 95% of our domain models map to a single view model (at least at the root – their hierarchy gets collapsed down).

Interesting idea though.