<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fluent Silverlight – Part 2 – Binding Properties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/gabrielschenker/2009/06/01/fluent-silverlight-part-2-binding-properties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/gabrielschenker/2009/06/01/fluent-silverlight-part-2-binding-properties/</link>
	<description>Blog about architectural patterns, best practices, coding principles and techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/gabrielschenker/2009/06/01/fluent-silverlight-part-2-binding-properties/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/gabrielschenker/archive/2009/06/02/fluent-silverlight-part-2-binding-properties.aspx#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Hi I am a contributer to the Habanero Framework and have been doing several WPF Silverlight projects.
Habanero does not implement an immediate solution to this (unlike its Winforms and Visual Web Gui solutions).

They focus on Dynamic and programattically generating user interfaces this increases testability incredibly and eliminates error prone data binding.
The fluent solution is the first match to this style of programming that I have found in the WPF/SL world. This makes sense to me </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I am a contributer to the Habanero Framework and have been doing several WPF Silverlight projects.<br />
Habanero does not implement an immediate solution to this (unlike its Winforms and Visual Web Gui solutions).</p>
<p>They focus on Dynamic and programattically generating user interfaces this increases testability incredibly and eliminates error prone data binding.<br />
The fluent solution is the first match to this style of programming that I have found in the WPF/SL world. This makes sense to me </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/gabrielschenker/2009/06/01/fluent-silverlight-part-2-binding-properties/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/gabrielschenker/archive/2009/06/02/fluent-silverlight-part-2-binding-properties.aspx#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Instead of 

this.WithTextBox(txtUsername)
    .Text(m =&gt; m.UserName)

Where you have to create explicit classes/methods for each control/property, why not use a more generic syntax like this:

this.Bind(txtUsername).On(x =&gt; x.Text).To(m =&gt; m.UserName);</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of </p>
<p>this.WithTextBox(txtUsername)<br />
    .Text(m => m.UserName)</p>
<p>Where you have to create explicit classes/methods for each control/property, why not use a more generic syntax like this:</p>
<p>this.Bind(txtUsername).On(x => x.Text).To(m => m.UserName);</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
