After nudging by Joe Ocampo and Scott Bellware, I finally sat down at finished “Design Patterns in Ruby” by Russ Olsen.
The format of most of the chapters made the book an interesting read:
1. A introduction to why you might need the pattern
2. A static language developer’s approach with the Ruby language
3. A seasoned Ruby developer’s approach to the design pattern
4. Using and Abusing
5. in the wild
6. Wrapping up
Some of the items that I learned [LosTechies is not a cult contrary to some of the examples you read below; some of the examples below are using LosTechies nomenclature but closely resemble what the author had in the book]
If any of the stuff below intrigues you: GO BUY THE BOOK. You won’t regret it. Even if you are trying to understand patterns in another language. Russ Olsen does an excellent job explaining the INTENT of the patterns.
FUN
When teaching the reader about “Truth, Lies, and nil”, the author even pokes fun at himself:
'russ' == 'smart' # sadly, false
BOOLEAN
In Ruby, zero, being neither false nor nil, evaluates to true in Boolean expression.
if 0
puts('Zero is true!')
end
will print out: Zero is true!
ARRAYS
Points for matrix reference in array examples
x = [] y = Array.new a = ['neo', 'trinity', 'tank']
REGULAR EXPRESSIONS
The flow of the language when creating regular expressions:
/old/ =~ 'this old house' # 5 - the index of 'old' /Russ|Russell/ =~ 'Fred' # nil - Fred is not Russ nor Russell /.*/ =~ 'any old string' # 0 - the RE will match anything
ARBITRARY PARAMETERS
Any author that uses DC comic character to explain arbitrary numbers of arguments, is a winner in my mind:
def describe_hero(name, *super_powers>
puts("Name: #{name}")
for power in super_powers
puts("Super power: #{power}")
end
end
describe_hero("Batman")
describe_hero("Flash", "speed")
describe_hero("Superman", "can fly", "x-ray vision", "invulnerable") # w00t!
DUCK TYPING AND UNIT TESTS
He mentions duck typing and the fact that “Unit Tests Are Not Optional” is a section heading when teaching the Template Method Pattern.
PROCS AND BLOCKS
# using the do/end notation
hello = lambda do
puts('Hello')
puts('I am a follower of Pablo')
end
#you may use curly braces instead of do/end
hello = lambda {
puts('Hello, I am a follower of Pablo')
}
#the preferred way to use curly braces
hello = lambda {puts('Hello, I am a follower of Pablo')}
STRATEGY PATTERN
using proc-based formatters to create a ruby-based strategy pattern
class Report attr_reader :title, :text attr_accessor :formatter def initialize(&formatter) @title = 'Monthly Report' @text = ['Things are going', 'really, really well.' ] @formatter = formatter end def output_report @formatter.call( self ) end end HTML_FORMATTER = lambda do |context| ...code to output HTML report = Report.new &HTML_FORMATTER report.output_report
You could create any type of formatter you want in a proc instead creating new classes.
OBSERVER PATTERN
Modules exist that encapsulate things that some of us static developers might already be used to:
require 'observer' class Employee include Observable attr_reader :name, :address attr_reader :salary def initialize( name, title, salary) @name = name @title = title @salary = salary end def salary=(new_salary) @salary = new_salary changed notify_observers(self) end end
ITERATOR PATTERN
Internal Iterators versus External Iterators: (had never heard it put this way)
External iterator – client drives the iteration…you won’t call next until you are good and ready for the next element
Internal iterator – the aggregate relentlessly pushes the code block to accept item after item.
COMMAND PATTERN
The Command pattern translates very smoothly into code blocks. Here is a PabloForPresidentButton class reworked to use code blocks:
class PabloForPresidentButton attr_accessor :command def initialize(&block) @command = block end # # Lots of button drawing and management # code omitted ... # def on_button_push @command.call if @command end end new_button = PabloForPresidentButton.new do # # Make a developer stop looking so nerdy # by placing one over his pocket protector # end
The author does not diminish the needs for classes. For straightforward actions, use a Proc object. For complex object or objects that will carry around a lot of state, create a command class.
ADAPTER PATTERN
Instead of adhering to some interface and trying to create your adapter, why not just extend the original class.
# load original class require 'lostechies_text_object' # now add some methods to original class class LosTechiesTextObject def sponsor return friend_of_pablo end def blogger return follower_of_pablo end end
Before any of you Open-Closed people attack, please re-read the definition of OCP – Open for extension, closed for modification. Doesn’t this adhere to that? :)
PROXY PATTERN
There are three tyes of Proxies: The Protection Proxy, Remote Proxy, Virtual Proxy
These are mentioned in the Gang of Four book. He introduces a Ruby-esqe way to approach proxies: the method_missing Method
class AccountProxy
def initialize(real_account)
@subject = real_account
end
def method_missing(name, *args)
puts("Delegating #{name} message to subject.")
@subject.send(name, *args)
end
end
ap = AccountProxy.new( BankAccount.new(100) )
ap.deposit(25)
ap.withdraw(50)
puts("account balance is now: #{ap.balance}")
Will output:
delegating deposit method to subject.
delegating withdraw method to subject.
delegating balance method to subject.
account balance is now: 75
DECORATOR PATTERN
module Decorator1
def do_something(common_item_to_decorate)
#code
end
end
module Decorator2
def do_something(common_item_to_decorate)
#code
end
end
d = SimpleItem.new()
d.extend(Decorator1)
d.extend(Decorator2)
e.do_something('howdy')
SINGLETON PATTERN
The author admits the career of the singleton has been checkered, but still shows that you can use it in the Ruby world. An example he gives us to allow testing of singleton implementation code is to put the implementation code in a base class and have the child be the singleton:
require 'singleton' class SimpleLogger # All of the logging functionality in this class... # Test this code end class SingletonLogger < SimpleLogger
FACTORY/ABSTRACT FACTORY PATTERN
I never had it straight, exactly, what the difference between these patterns were (yes, besides name). I never bothered to look. According to the author, Factory returns back a single object while Abstract Factory is “an object dedicated to creating a compatible set of objects”. According to GoF book (which I have open in front of me), Abstract Factory “provides an interface for creating families of related or dependent objects without specifying their concreate classes”. Which one do you think would have turned the light bulb off in your head? :)
The other item was using “Convention Over Configuration” to generate abstract factories:
class IOFactory
def initialize(format)
@reader_class = self.class.const_get("#{format}Reader")
@writer_class = self.class.const_get("#{format}Writer")
end
def new_reader
@reader_class.new
end
def new_writer
@writer_class.new
end
end
html_factory = IOFactory.new('HTML')
html_reader = html_factory.new_reader
pdf_factory = IOFactory.new('PDF')
pdf_writer = pdf_factory.new_writer
Notice the correct classes (reader/writer) are generated dynamically with the help of the const_get Ruby method.
BUILDER PATTERN
Magic methods: “very easy to implement using the method_missing technique…you simply catch all unexpected method calls with method_missing and parse the method name to see if it matches the pattern of your magic method name”.
#example method passed into computer builder class
builder.add_dvd_and_harddisk
#or
builder.add_turbo_and_dvd_dvd_and_harddisk
def method_missing(name, *args)
words = name.to_s.split("_")
return super(name, *args) unless words.shift == 'add'
words.each do |word|
#next is same as continue in for loop in C#
next if word == 'and'
#each of the following method calls are a part of the builder class
add_cd if word == 'cd'
add_dvd if word == 'dvd'
add_hard_disk(100000) if word == 'harddisk'
turbo if word == 'turbo'
end
end
Last 3 Chapters are the meat of the book:
INTERPRETER PATTERN (place where Bellware told me to start)
DOMAIN SPECIFIC LANGUAGE (DSL)
CONVENTION OVER CONFIGURATION
Those stay obscure so you can go read it. I think the book is worth a visit on Safari books if you have an account or worth the purchase for the bathroom reading.
I enjoyed it. Thanks Scott and Joe

Cheers!
Your welcome,
About the only thing I would critique is that from what I have observed from most frameworks in Ruby is that the parens are omitted when there is only one arg. It reads betters:
# d = SimpleItem.new()
# d.extend(Decorator1)
# d.extend(Decorator2)
to
# d = SimpleItem.new
# d.extend Decorator1
# d.extend Decorator2
Jason,
Hey thanks for the kind words, I’m glad that you are finding the book useful. The funny thing about the factories patterns is a) that I wasn’t 100% clear on the difference between the two before I started researching the book and b) given Ruby’s dynamic nature, you really don’t find many of examples of the classic factories in real Ruby code.
Oh, and in the interest of fairness I’m going to include some Marvel characters in my next book.
Russ
Joe Ocampo wrote:
> About the only thing I would critique is that from what I have
> observed from most frameworks in Ruby is that the parens are
> omitted when there is only one arg.
I think there is a range of opinions regarding the parens, yes or no? question in the Ruby community. I am sure, however, that leaving the parens off is the surest way to confuse people who are newly arrived in Ruby from say Java. I can’t tell you the number of times that I have confused a room full of newly minted Ruby programmers because I left the parens off of some example. Put the parens back on and their faces light up.
Russ