Comments on: Separation of Concerns by example: Part 1 http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/06/20/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1/ Strong opinions, weakly held Sun, 19 May 2013 03:22:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: pkehcjaeucf http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/06/20/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1/#comment-616 pkehcjaeucf Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:19:52 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/06/19/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1.aspx#comment-616 redUer <a href="http://vkenxctomraf.com/">vkenxctomraf</a>, [url=http://svqpgdhekjrd.com/]svqpgdhekjrd[/url], [link=http://cxygayhghuwm.com/]cxygayhghuwm[/link], http://enpqieutrjek.com/ redUer vkenxctomraf, [url=http://svqpgdhekjrd.com/]svqpgdhekjrd[/url], [link=http://cxygayhghuwm.com/]cxygayhghuwm[/link], http://enpqieutrjek.com/

]]> By: eKnacks http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/06/20/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1/#comment-615 eKnacks Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:34:45 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/06/19/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1.aspx#comment-615 You've been knacked. Keep up the good work. You’ve been knacked. Keep up the good work.

]]> By: Duncan http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/06/20/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1/#comment-614 Duncan Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:07:35 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/06/19/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1.aspx#comment-614 Thanks, this looks like a great example, I am looking forward to the rest of the series, I like description of the refactoring to solve the static method problem. Thanks, this looks like a great example, I am looking forward to the rest of the series, I like description of the refactoring to solve the static method problem.

]]> By: Colin Jack http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/06/20/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1/#comment-613 Colin Jack Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:41:35 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/06/19/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1.aspx#comment-613 As Joshua said its a great idea for a series, looking forward to reading the rest. As Joshua said its a great idea for a series, looking forward to reading the rest.

]]> By: Joshua Flanagan http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/06/20/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1/#comment-612 Joshua Flanagan Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:31:28 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/06/19/separation-of-concerns-by-example-part-1.aspx#comment-612 This is a great idea for a series, and I have a suggestion that might make it a little more effective. I assume the target audience is readers that are not yet used to this type of development, but are curious enough to learn. Chances are, they are not using ReSharper and references to things like Ctrl_Alt-M will be confusing. It may slow you down a bit, but I bet it would help the readers a lot if you suggest the default Visual Studio key mappings (Ctrl-R, Ctrl-M - I had to look it up) when available, or how to go about the refactoring manually if it is not available in VS. Yes, everyone should be using a tool like ReSharper, but lets not make it a barrier to entry to understanding the practices. This is a great idea for a series, and I have a suggestion that might make it a little more effective.

I assume the target audience is readers that are not yet used to this type of development, but are curious enough to learn. Chances are, they are not using ReSharper and references to things like Ctrl_Alt-M will be confusing. It may slow you down a bit, but I bet it would help the readers a lot if you suggest the default Visual Studio key mappings (Ctrl-R, Ctrl-M – I had to look it up) when available, or how to go about the refactoring manually if it is not available in VS.
Yes, everyone should be using a tool like ReSharper, but lets not make it a barrier to entry to understanding the practices.

]]>