Comments on: Convention, configuration and WCF http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/ Strong opinions, weakly held Wed, 22 May 2013 13:39:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: erichexter http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/#comment-787 erichexter Wed, 20 Aug 2008 03:46:45 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf.aspx#comment-787 3.5 sp1 really covers most of your pain, here. They have clearly stated the support for POCO with wcf in the service pack. I think it is time for Rhino Mocks to not worry about being all things to all languages and just roll in the fix for c#.... 3.5 sp1 really covers most of your pain, here. They have clearly stated the support for POCO with wcf in the service pack. I think it is time for Rhino Mocks to not worry about being all things to all languages and just roll in the fix for c#….

]]> By: Jeremy Gray http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/#comment-786 Jeremy Gray Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:17:01 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf.aspx#comment-786 @Jimmy and Ben - Consider yourselves very lucky to only have customers that are either good or awesome. ;) @Jimmy and Ben – Consider yourselves very lucky to only have customers that are either good or awesome. ;)

]]> By: Ben Scheirman http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/#comment-785 Ben Scheirman Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:44:35 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf.aspx#comment-785 Wow, I have that same enumeration in many of MY projects! Wow, I have that same enumeration in many of MY projects!

]]> By: Jimmy Bogard http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/#comment-784 Jimmy Bogard Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:19:21 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf.aspx#comment-784 @Rob, Moto Ah thanks, I'll check that out. The WCF improvements seem to have been glossed over in many announcements. Though with Ayende's recent troubles, I'm not sure when I'll upgrade. @Rob, Moto

Ah thanks, I’ll check that out. The WCF improvements seem to have been glossed over in many announcements.

Though with Ayende’s recent troubles, I’m not sure when I’ll upgrade.

]]> By: Rob http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/#comment-783 Rob Tue, 19 Aug 2008 03:10:02 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf.aspx#comment-783 I Believe that sp1 enables you to serialize objects without DataContract/DataMember. But, I don't think you can remove the ServiceContract/OperationContract. I haven't confirmed yet. I Believe that sp1 enables you to serialize objects without DataContract/DataMember. But, I don’t think you can remove the ServiceContract/OperationContract. I haven’t confirmed yet.

]]> By: MotoWilliams http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/#comment-782 MotoWilliams Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:35:46 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf.aspx#comment-782 I need to proof read - Does this get better with the SP in that some of those attribues aren't needed anymore? I need to proof read – Does this get better with the SP in that some of those attribues aren’t needed anymore?

]]> By: MotoWilliams http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf/#comment-781 MotoWilliams Tue, 19 Aug 2008 01:17:33 +0000 /blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2008/08/18/convention-configuration-and-wcf.aspx#comment-781 Will this be improved, in your eyes, somewhat with the 3.5 SP1 (after MS Fixes the SP) changes to WCF in that [DataContract] / [DataMember]? Will this be improved, in your eyes, somewhat with the 3.5 SP1 (after MS Fixes the SP) changes to WCF in that [DataContract] / [DataMember]?

]]>