<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A testing survey on a large project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2009/05/06/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2009/05/06/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions, weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No More Hacks</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2009/05/06/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>No More Hacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2009/05/05/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project.aspx#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>This is a really excellent article; it is particularly great to see numbers, even though your team might not get excited about them, it is great to see them so that people (ahem) who don&#039;t work with lots of tests can see what &quot;a lot&quot; of tests looks like!

I&#039;m always interested in the line between a &quot;unit test&quot; and an integration test. Particularly for classes which have responsibility for bringing together the behaviour of other classes (e.g., Facade pattern). 

http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/when-is-a-unit-test-not-a-unit-test/

But as you say, the real value of the integration tests is the end-to-end; when you have rewired everything in between the UI and the database then you end up throwing away a lot of unit tests as the units have gone as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really excellent article; it is particularly great to see numbers, even though your team might not get excited about them, it is great to see them so that people (ahem) who don&#8217;t work with lots of tests can see what &#8220;a lot&#8221; of tests looks like!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always interested in the line between a &#8220;unit test&#8221; and an integration test. Particularly for classes which have responsibility for bringing together the behaviour of other classes (e.g., Facade pattern). </p>
<p><a href="http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/when-is-a-unit-test-not-a-unit-test/" rel="nofollow">http://nomorehacks.wordpress.com/2008/11/05/when-is-a-unit-test-not-a-unit-test/</a></p>
<p>But as you say, the real value of the integration tests is the end-to-end; when you have rewired everything in between the UI and the database then you end up throwing away a lot of unit tests as the units have gone as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bogardj</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2009/05/06/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>bogardj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2009/05/05/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project.aspx#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>@Tim

We use WatiN w/ Gallio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim</p>
<p>We use WatiN w/ Gallio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZVolkov</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2009/05/06/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>ZVolkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2009/05/05/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project.aspx#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>The best part of this post imho is the one about Integration Tests and how they allow major redesigns. It seems so obvious but many teams don&#039;t do true end-to-end integration tests and end up having to lock the design &quot;until next big version&quot; which causes definite code rot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best part of this post imho is the one about Integration Tests and how they allow major redesigns. It seems so obvious but many teams don&#8217;t do true end-to-end integration tests and end up having to lock the design &#8220;until next big version&#8221; which causes definite code rot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristofer</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2009/05/06/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project/#comment-1508</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristofer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2009/05/05/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project.aspx#comment-1508</guid>
		<description>Nice post, just passed it along to my project manager.

Hearing more about your &quot;solid UI testing strategy&quot; would be really interesting! + also some more technical details about your integration tests using the layer right below the UI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, just passed it along to my project manager.</p>
<p>Hearing more about your &#8220;solid UI testing strategy&#8221; would be really interesting! + also some more technical details about your integration tests using the layer right below the UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Ross</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2009/05/06/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project/#comment-1507</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 07:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/jimmy_bogard/archive/2009/05/05/a-testing-survey-on-a-large-project.aspx#comment-1507</guid>
		<description>Great post, Jimmy. What tool do you use for your automated UI testing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Jimmy. What tool do you use for your automated UI testing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
