<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gawker sites breaking the web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions, weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aluminium Kozijnen</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3304</link>
		<dc:creator>Aluminium Kozijnen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3304</guid>
		<description>I think that new redesign gawker sites are working well.. After change this button.. Is it correct..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that new redesign gawker sites are working well.. After change this button.. Is it correct..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Chase</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>It has changed. Back buttons suck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has changed. Back buttons suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnis Lapsa</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3301</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnis Lapsa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3301</guid>
		<description>Works on chromium 12 too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works on chromium 12 too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Moberg</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3299</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Moberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3299</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it is really bad. I tried the back button in Chrome today and it does not work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it is really bad. I tried the back button in Chrome today and it does not work. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thedric Walker</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3297</link>
		<dc:creator>Thedric Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3297</guid>
		<description>Apparently they fixed the Back button issue. But the site is definitely not keyboard friendly.  All I have to say is don&#039;t accidentally hit a horizontal arrow key.

Unfortunately Gawker wasn&#039;t the only site to change to a design I&#039;m not to fund of. *looks around at the new Los Techies/Codebetter/Devlico.us* </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently they fixed the Back button issue. But the site is definitely not keyboard friendly.  All I have to say is don&#8217;t accidentally hit a horizontal arrow key.</p>
<p>Unfortunately Gawker wasn&#8217;t the only site to change to a design I&#8217;m not to fund of. *looks around at the new Los Techies/Codebetter/Devlico.us* </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stelios Axiomakaros</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Stelios Axiomakaros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>lifehacker also does the same</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lifehacker also does the same</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin lovell</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3295</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin lovell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3295</guid>
		<description>And it seems like you have severely broken the RSS channel - this is the fifth time that this has been marked unread by Google Reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it seems like you have severely broken the RSS channel &#8211; this is the fifth time that this has been marked unread by Google Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Bogard</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Bogard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>You know, I tried it on IE8-9 and I saw this behavior. I wonder what&#039;s different...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I tried it on IE8-9 and I saw this behavior. I wonder what&#8217;s different&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Haydon</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Haydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>Since their redesign I&#039;ve stopped using the website, it&#039;s terrible now. Usability is terrible on the site now. (in my opinion)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since their redesign I&#8217;ve stopped using the website, it&#8217;s terrible now. Usability is terrible on the site now. (in my opinion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxime Rouiller</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxime Rouiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/04/05/gawker-sites-breaking-the-web/#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>Actually no... it&#039;s really that bad. The rule about the Back button still stands. They just don&#039;t give a **** anymore. Add that to the obscene amount of advertisement and it makes you want to change site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually no&#8230; it&#8217;s really that bad. The rule about the Back button still stands. They just don&#8217;t give a **** anymore. Add that to the obscene amount of advertisement and it makes you want to change site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
