<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleaning up POSTs in ASP.NET MVC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions, weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HerrodFrye</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-5435</link>
		<dc:creator>HerrodFrye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-5435</guid>
		<description>Good One I would d like to know how would you do the validation of your entity? mean&#039;s I also developed a Domain model and apply Fluent Validation to validate my entities but I see you&#039;re getting Editmodel on your POST actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good One I would d like to know how would you do the validation of your entity? mean&#8217;s I also developed a Domain model and apply Fluent Validation to validate my entities but I see you&#8217;re getting Editmodel on your POST actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rana Ansih21</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4352</link>
		<dc:creator>Rana Ansih21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4352</guid>
		<description>hiiihihih</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hiiihihih</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The state of &#8220;web-based&#8221; MVC &#187; Justin Lovell&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>The state of &#8220;web-based&#8221; MVC &#187; Justin Lovell&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>[...] and your business model. These controllers then need to translate that into the appropriate business-logic commands as demonstrated by Jimmy Bogard.   This entry was posted in Conversational and tagged asp.net mvc, fubumvc. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and your business model. These controllers then need to translate that into the appropriate business-logic commands as demonstrated by Jimmy Bogard.   This entry was posted in Conversational and tagged asp.net mvc, fubumvc. Bookmark the permalink. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>No, not really. Not without taking over the action invoker, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not really. Not without taking over the action invoker, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Flood</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4140</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Flood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4140</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to get around the service locator pattern when resolving IFormHandler in the FormActionResult? I&#039;ve thought about pushing it to the constructor but it ends up with a DefaultController, forcing Derived controllers to be limited to a single viewmodel. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to get around the service locator pattern when resolving IFormHandler in the FormActionResult? I&#8217;ve thought about pushing it to the constructor but it ends up with a DefaultController, forcing Derived controllers to be limited to a single viewmodel. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRG Pattern &#8211; How to Keep MVC ModelState &#171; throw new BlogPostIdeaException();</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4068</link>
		<dc:creator>PRG Pattern &#8211; How to Keep MVC ModelState &#171; throw new BlogPostIdeaException();</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2011 06:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4068</guid>
		<description>[...] I like the way this has been handled but because I like to learn from other people&#8217;s ideas I also like to use the workflow for HTTP POSTs as described by Jimmy Bogard in his post, Cleaning up POSTs in ASP.NET MVC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I like the way this has been handled but because I like to learn from other people&#8217;s ideas I also like to use the workflow for HTTP POSTs as described by Jimmy Bogard in his post, Cleaning up POSTs in ASP.NET MVC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4057</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4057</guid>
		<description>Well, this is a pattern that only should be in place when the complexity found in POST actions in MVC warrant the complexity. For CRUD apps, I would optimize the &quot;getting data in and out&quot; vector. For task-based UIs, we&#039;ve found this to be helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is a pattern that only should be in place when the complexity found in POST actions in MVC warrant the complexity. For CRUD apps, I would optimize the &#8220;getting data in and out&#8221; vector. For task-based UIs, we&#8217;ve found this to be helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someone</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4056</link>
		<dc:creator>Someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4056</guid>
		<description>The problem we are trying to solve hasn&#039;t changed in 20+ years.  We need to move data from an input form to a database, and back again.  MVC, and the deep OO abstractions described in this article, seem exceedingly complex for such a basic problem.  It&#039;s as if the KISS principle has been thrown entirely out the window, in favor of chasing some computer science, refactoring, abstraction nirvana.  In my experience, very few developers are savvy enough to maintain and enhance code such as this.  I believe we have forgotten the importance of developing for maintenance, not just the latest CS pattern gimmick.   How much value does all this complexity really add to a project?   So much time is required to get a productive, functional understanding of the theory, tools and techniques of the framework, that the actual business problem being solved is compromised - or at least obscured by layers of complexity that have nothing to do with the original problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem we are trying to solve hasn&#8217;t changed in 20+ years.  We need to move data from an input form to a database, and back again.  MVC, and the deep OO abstractions described in this article, seem exceedingly complex for such a basic problem.  It&#8217;s as if the KISS principle has been thrown entirely out the window, in favor of chasing some computer science, refactoring, abstraction nirvana.  In my experience, very few developers are savvy enough to maintain and enhance code such as this.  I believe we have forgotten the importance of developing for maintenance, not just the latest CS pattern gimmick.   How much value does all this complexity really add to a project?   So much time is required to get a productive, functional understanding of the theory, tools and techniques of the framework, that the actual business problem being solved is compromised &#8211; or at least obscured by layers of complexity that have nothing to do with the original problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carpet Cleaning Severna Park</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4020</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpet Cleaning Severna Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-4020</guid>
		<description>

I have never tried this carpet cleaner team yet; but
probably I will have to soon. I am expecting the result would be in good
quality and the customers will be satisfied of the service rendered. 
 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never tried this carpet cleaner team yet; but<br />
probably I will have to soon. I am expecting the result would be in good<br />
quality and the customers will be satisfied of the service rendered.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrid Hammack</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrid Hammack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/06/22/cleaning-up-posts-in-asp-net-mvc/#comment-3964</guid>
		<description>Your site is very helpful. Many thanks for sharing. Looking forward to more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site is very helpful. Many thanks for sharing. Looking forward to more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
