<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dart Hello World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions, weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Martin</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-5541</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-5541</guid>
		<description>Have you changed your opinion of Dart over the last year? I&#039;ve been using it since M2 and find it to be fantastic and it&#039;s still pre V1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you changed your opinion of Dart over the last year? I&#8217;ve been using it since M2 and find it to be fantastic and it&#8217;s still pre V1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why is javascript the only client side scripting language implemented in browsers? [closed] &#124; PHP Developer Resource</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4624</link>
		<dc:creator>Why is javascript the only client side scripting language implemented in browsers? [closed] &#124; PHP Developer Resource</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 02:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4624</guid>
		<description>[...] use JavaScript as an intermediate. I&#8217;d argue that should be what Dart does as well, though they have some room to improve.        Tagged: BrowserJavaScriptquestionsStandardsweb       /* * * CONFIGURATION VARIABLES: EDIT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] use JavaScript as an intermediate. I&#8217;d argue that should be what Dart does as well, though they have some room to improve.        Tagged: BrowserJavaScriptquestionsStandardsweb       /* * * CONFIGURATION VARIABLES: EDIT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4019</guid>
		<description>Check this out as well. C# like language that compiles to javascript.

http://www.toptensoftware.com/prefix/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check this out as well. C# like language that compiles to javascript.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.toptensoftware.com/prefix/" rel="nofollow">http://www.toptensoftware.com/prefix/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Bousquet</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4015</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Bousquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4015</guid>
		<description> &quot;and now we’ve
 built Java executing in the browser.&quot;

Isn&#039;t it exactly what google want to do with Dart? I mean they want a statically typed language so you can reason about code. This bring automatic refactotring, easy code navigation (call tree), more advenced metrics etc.

We can like java or not, but it is effective for the kind of things Dart was invented: big projects with lot of developpers.

If you think about yourself has a lone developper or work in small projects teams, Dart might not be the most productive tool.

Differents needs, differents tool.

And how? Did you check how big a modern JS VM is? To just print hello world in JS, you have to run a browser, an URL, a JS VM etc... And most machine would fail to do it with less than a few MB of memory... To display &quot;Hello world&quot;. Think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8220;and now we’ve<br />
 built Java executing in the browser.&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it exactly what google want to do with Dart? I mean they want a statically typed language so you can reason about code. This bring automatic refactotring, easy code navigation (call tree), more advenced metrics etc.</p>
<p>We can like java or not, but it is effective for the kind of things Dart was invented: big projects with lot of developpers.</p>
<p>If you think about yourself has a lone developper or work in small projects teams, Dart might not be the most productive tool.</p>
<p>Differents needs, differents tool.</p>
<p>And how? Did you check how big a modern JS VM is? To just print hello world in JS, you have to run a browser, an URL, a JS VM etc&#8230; And most machine would fail to do it with less than a few MB of memory&#8230; To display &#8220;Hello world&#8221;. Think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Rendle</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Rendle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>I understand the point of Dart. When you&#039;re writing 100s of Ks of lines of JavaScript code for your rich HTML5 application, it pretty quickly becomes hard to maintain, check and test. This is because JavaScript was hacked together to perform extremely simple tasks like form validation and basic DOM manipulation. Dart has been designed from the ground up as a language for creating complex applications. It doesn&#039;t have to maintain backward compatibility with the hacky, lightweight language, so all the hacky, lightweight annoyances are not an issue.

Also, because it&#039;s been designed by a small team working together every day, it&#039;s being developed very fast, unlike JavaScript, which is taking the &quot;evolution&quot; concept very literally in terms of the timescales involved.

My issue is that I thought Google were working on a compiler that would take the proposed ES6 syntax and compile it to current JavaScript, which seems like a better use of development time. But I also like Dart&#039;s concepts around types and interfaces and the compile/debug-time checking that enables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the point of Dart. When you&#8217;re writing 100s of Ks of lines of JavaScript code for your rich HTML5 application, it pretty quickly becomes hard to maintain, check and test. This is because JavaScript was hacked together to perform extremely simple tasks like form validation and basic DOM manipulation. Dart has been designed from the ground up as a language for creating complex applications. It doesn&#8217;t have to maintain backward compatibility with the hacky, lightweight language, so all the hacky, lightweight annoyances are not an issue.</p>
<p>Also, because it&#8217;s been designed by a small team working together every day, it&#8217;s being developed very fast, unlike JavaScript, which is taking the &#8220;evolution&#8221; concept very literally in terms of the timescales involved.</p>
<p>My issue is that I thought Google were working on a compiler that would take the proposed ES6 syntax and compile it to current JavaScript, which seems like a better use of development time. But I also like Dart&#8217;s concepts around types and interfaces and the compile/debug-time checking that enables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Evans</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>David Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>The primary reasons for Google developing Dart is for the following reasons, Serialization of data, additional security running in a VM environment and running code nativity on the client environment(Think net-books, server applications and Cloud storage). The Dart to Java-Script conversion tool functionality is just to get developers to initially invest in learning Dart language knowing that their programs will run in any browser that currently supports Java Script and could/would start up quicker and run faster in the web browser supporting a Dart VM. This will be included in future version of the Chrome Browser, IMO probably also in the Fire-Fox Browser either via a community development effort or led directly by Google, for the IE web-browser probably when &quot;HELL FREEZES OVER&quot; and for Opera? Who knows.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The primary reasons for Google developing Dart is for the following reasons, Serialization of data, additional security running in a VM environment and running code nativity on the client environment(Think net-books, server applications and Cloud storage). The Dart to Java-Script conversion tool functionality is just to get developers to initially invest in learning Dart language knowing that their programs will run in any browser that currently supports Java Script and could/would start up quicker and run faster in the web browser supporting a Dart VM. This will be included in future version of the Chrome Browser, IMO probably also in the Fire-Fox Browser either via a community development effort or led directly by Google, for the IE web-browser probably when &#8220;HELL FREEZES OVER&#8221; and for Opera? Who knows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3998</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3998</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a comparison, really, it&#039;s looking at what it takes to have Dart run in JS. The actual JS code is the interesting part, to me.

Check the analysis in the link, it&#039;s a fascinating read on JS code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a comparison, really, it&#8217;s looking at what it takes to have Dart run in JS. The actual JS code is the interesting part, to me.</p>
<p>Check the analysis in the link, it&#8217;s a fascinating read on JS code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3997</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3997</guid>
		<description>I just enjoyed the memes in the gist comments.

I didn&#039;t intend to imply that all Dart code compiles to JS, but that the compiled Dart code is really interesting in what you need to do to run a static-ish language on top of JS. Interesting, and silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just enjoyed the memes in the gist comments.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t intend to imply that all Dart code compiles to JS, but that the compiled Dart code is really interesting in what you need to do to run a static-ish language on top of JS. Interesting, and silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe Moothart</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3996</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe Moothart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3996</guid>
		<description>This is BS. The point of dart is to create a language that can be more quickly compiled/interpreted by the browser - it is intended to be native. So its unfair and misleading to say &quot;Dart compiles to Javascript&quot;. The fact that Google has released (an early version of) a Dart-to-JS cross-compiler does not detract at all from that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is BS. The point of dart is to create a language that can be more quickly compiled/interpreted by the browser &#8211; it is intended to be native. So its unfair and misleading to say &#8220;Dart compiles to Javascript&#8221;. The fact that Google has released (an early version of) a Dart-to-JS cross-compiler does not detract at all from that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McKay</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3995</link>
		<dc:creator>James McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2011/10/12/the-dart-hello-world/#comment-3995</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall reading that the reason they created Dart is that there are too many JavaScript frameworks. This comes to mind (http://xkcd.com/927/):
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall reading that the reason they created Dart is that there are too many JavaScript frameworks. This comes to mind (<a href="http://xkcd.com/927/" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/927/</a>):</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
