<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limits of performance optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/</link>
	<description>Strong opinions, weakly held</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james mckay dot net &#187; In response to criticisms of CSS pre-processors</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4597</link>
		<dc:creator>james mckay dot net &#187; In response to criticisms of CSS pre-processors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 07:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4597</guid>
		<description>[...] are aware of what causes the most bloat (mixins), and take a little bit of care, you’ll be fine. Maintainability versus performance is a trade-off that you have to make at every level of your code, not just this one, so it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are aware of what causes the most bloat (mixins), and take a little bit of care, you’ll be fine. Maintainability versus performance is a trade-off that you have to make at every level of your code, not just this one, so it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4591</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4591</guid>
		<description>haha yep. That&#039;s what I was saying Jason. A bit of awareness of the hole you&#039;re digging for yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha yep. That&#8217;s what I was saying Jason. A bit of awareness of the hole you&#8217;re digging for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Meckley</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4589</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Meckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4589</guid>
		<description>Jimmy&#039;s not suggesting there should be 10 layers of abstraction.  The point is to balance performance with maintainability. To far in either direction creates a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy&#8217;s not suggesting there should be 10 layers of abstraction.  The point is to balance performance with maintainability. To far in either direction creates a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4586</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4586</guid>
		<description>Sometimes you can make beautiful code that is easy to maintain and looks great. But your data-access and network are abstracted 10 layers deep. 

Try and optimise that son. Or even better - diagnose it.

A bit of awareness of what is all I&#039;m saying based on experience of facades, wrapping, controllers, wrapping god knows what with 50 database and web service calls scattered from top to bottom of the stack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you can make beautiful code that is easy to maintain and looks great. But your data-access and network are abstracted 10 layers deep. </p>
<p>Try and optimise that son. Or even better &#8211; diagnose it.</p>
<p>A bit of awareness of what is all I&#8217;m saying based on experience of facades, wrapping, controllers, wrapping god knows what with 50 database and web service calls scattered from top to bottom of the stack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Hughson</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4585</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Hughson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/jimmybogard/2012/05/03/limits-of-performance-optimization/#comment-4585</guid>
		<description>Bravo.  Doggedly eking out every ounce of a given QOS criteria (performance, security, etc.) without thought to cost and need is as detrimental as sloppy work.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo.  Doggedly eking out every ounce of a given QOS criteria (performance, security, etc.) without thought to cost and need is as detrimental as sloppy work.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
