Comments on: Introducing NUnit.Behave or insert what ever other catchy name http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/06/29/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name/ Tales from the field... Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Garth http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/06/29/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name/#comment-71 Garth Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:18:30 +0000 /blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx#comment-71 Maybe this could be combined with NSpec (http://nspec.tigris.org/) so you can drop the [Test] attribute and Asserts? Maybe this could be combined with NSpec (http://nspec.tigris.org/) so you can drop the [Test] attribute and Asserts?

]]> By: Joe Ocampo http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/06/29/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name/#comment-70 Joe Ocampo Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:32:26 +0000 /blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx#comment-70 Steven, I plead ignorance. Thanks for the update, I will update the code. Steven,

I plead ignorance. Thanks for the update, I will update the code.

]]> By: Steven Solomon http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/06/29/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name/#comment-69 Steven Solomon Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:19:02 +0000 /blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx#comment-69 I was just wondering why you created your own action<T> delegate rather that use the .Net framework Action<T> delegate? I change the code to use this, and it all works fine. I was just wondering why you created your own action delegate rather that use the .Net framework Action delegate? I change the code to use this, and it all works fine.

]]> By: Joe Ocampo http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/06/29/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name/#comment-68 Joe Ocampo Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:51:42 +0000 /blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx#comment-68 Joey I haven't looked into MbUnit since I have been using NUnit for some time. Not that I am thrilled with NUnit but it get the job done. I don't think that it would be too hard to extended what I have done for NUnit to work with any other testing framework it's just a matter of wrapping my head around the TestFixture and assertion model. But doable none the less. I can't agree more on fluent interfaces. Joey

I haven’t looked into MbUnit since I have been using NUnit for some time. Not that I am thrilled with NUnit but it get the job done.

I don’t think that it would be too hard to extended what I have done for NUnit to work with any other testing framework it’s just a matter of wrapping my head around the TestFixture and assertion model. But doable none the less.

I can’t agree more on fluent interfaces.

]]> By: joeyDotNet http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/06/29/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name/#comment-67 joeyDotNet Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:51:25 +0000 /blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/06/28/introducing-nunit-behave-or-insert-what-ever-other-catchy-name.aspx#comment-67 Very cool syntax indeed. I just can't get enough of fluent interfaces... I have NO experience in extending any of the xUnit frameworks, but for what it's worth, I've heard that MbUnit is a bit more extensible, but again, I totally can't back that up. Just maybe something to look into... I'm a huge fan of using MbUnit... it's like NUnit on steriods... :) Very cool syntax indeed. I just can’t get enough of fluent interfaces…

I have NO experience in extending any of the xUnit frameworks, but for what it’s worth, I’ve heard that MbUnit is a bit more extensible, but again, I totally can’t back that up. Just maybe something to look into…

I’m a huge fan of using MbUnit… it’s like NUnit on steriods… :)

]]>