<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Convention over Configuration: The Haack Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response/</link>
	<description>Tales from the field...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ocampo</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ocampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response.aspx#comment-300</guid>
		<description>@Ben 

Luckily I just answered this question.  :-)

&lt;copied&gt;
Just because we have been doing it doesn&#039;t mean we have to continue.

I hate to use this but we are like a bunch of lemming s sometime and we just fall in with the standard MS conventions.

MR and RoR have been very successful with the Convention over Configuration approach.  And I think for us to turn a blind eye towards this approach simply because MS want to change it is a disservice to the community.

A majority of the MVC framework takes a convention over configuration approach (ie the folder structure).  This slight decoration causes a shift in that way of thinking.  It is not about a matter of style as it is a matter of adhering to framework principle no matter how esoteric they may be to new comers.

The fact of the matter is all we are asking for is a choice and I believe Phil and the rest of the MVC team has given us this with the &quot;ConventionController&quot; so now it truly is a matter of style.

Although I do like Scott&#039;s suggestion about the controller defaulting to this behavior and forcing the &quot;SafeMode&quot; when needed.  Similar to VB&#039;s option explicit.
&lt;/copied&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben </p>
<p>Luckily I just answered this question.  <img src='http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><copied><br />
Just because we have been doing it doesn&#8217;t mean we have to continue.</p>
<p>I hate to use this but we are like a bunch of lemming s sometime and we just fall in with the standard MS conventions.</p>
<p>MR and RoR have been very successful with the Convention over Configuration approach.  And I think for us to turn a blind eye towards this approach simply because MS want to change it is a disservice to the community.</p>
<p>A majority of the MVC framework takes a convention over configuration approach (ie the folder structure).  This slight decoration causes a shift in that way of thinking.  It is not about a matter of style as it is a matter of adhering to framework principle no matter how esoteric they may be to new comers.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is all we are asking for is a choice and I believe Phil and the rest of the MVC team has given us this with the &#8220;ConventionController&#8221; so now it truly is a matter of style.</p>
<p>Although I do like Scott&#8217;s suggestion about the controller defaulting to this behavior and forcing the &#8220;SafeMode&#8221; when needed.  Similar to VB&#8217;s option explicit.<br />
</copied></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Scheirman</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Scheirman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response.aspx#comment-299</guid>
		<description>Yeah that&#039;s really easy to implement, but I have to ask:

Why in the world do we care about 1 extra attribute?  Write a R# template of VS code snippet and be done with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that&#8217;s really easy to implement, but I have to ask:</p>
<p>Why in the world do we care about 1 extra attribute?  Write a R# template of VS code snippet and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Chambers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeocampo/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joe_ocampo/archive/2007/12/09/convention-over-configuration-the-haack-response.aspx#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Cheers to that.

I&#039;m very happy that the community say this type of turn around. It definitely alleviates my doubts =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers to that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very happy that the community say this type of turn around. It definitely alleviates my doubts =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
