<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refactoring towards a DRY, fluent interface</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/09/06/refactoring-towards-a-dry-fluent-interface/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/09/06/refactoring-towards-a-dry-fluent-interface/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Scally</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/09/06/refactoring-towards-a-dry-fluent-interface/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Scally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2007/09/06/refactoring-towards-a-dry-fluent-interface.aspx#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I liked this. It&#039;s definitely given me something to think about in terms of how I structure my code. 

I&#039;m tempted to make a code listing of both ways of performing this task (original and refactored) to see which way is more readable. It&#039;s hard to tell right now and that would be my main concern; that I would be gaining a slight decrease in code repitition at the cost of overall maintainability. 

I guess I will try this sometime and see how it looks in the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked this. It&#8217;s definitely given me something to think about in terms of how I structure my code. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m tempted to make a code listing of both ways of performing this task (original and refactored) to see which way is more readable. It&#8217;s hard to tell right now and that would be my main concern; that I would be gaining a slight decrease in code repitition at the cost of overall maintainability. </p>
<p>I guess I will try this sometime and see how it looks in the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
