<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random Thoughts On Humility and Perfection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 23:08:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry MacLean</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry MacLean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2007/11/15/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection.aspx#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Great, thought provoking post!  So here&#039;s some of what has been provoked:

Perfection has only been achieved once, but that shouldn&#039;t stop us striving for it.  I agree that it&#039;s more of a process than an end-point, but I would suggest that, like code, it&#039;s definition changes depending on what it&#039;s applied to.

I disagree that it&#039;s achievable by mere us.

As to apologies for not having more code in your posts, isn&#039;t the &quot;perfect&quot; developer a combination of attitude and ideas, of which coding ability is actuall a small portion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, thought provoking post!  So here&#8217;s some of what has been provoked:</p>
<p>Perfection has only been achieved once, but that shouldn&#8217;t stop us striving for it.  I agree that it&#8217;s more of a process than an end-point, but I would suggest that, like code, it&#8217;s definition changes depending on what it&#8217;s applied to.</p>
<p>I disagree that it&#8217;s achievable by mere us.</p>
<p>As to apologies for not having more code in your posts, isn&#8217;t the &#8220;perfect&#8221; developer a combination of attitude and ideas, of which coding ability is actuall a small portion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Campbell</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2007/11/15/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection.aspx#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Joey,

Thanks for some real thought provoking insights!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey,</p>
<p>Thanks for some real thought provoking insights!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Nyborg</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Nyborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2007/11/15/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection.aspx#comment-83</guid>
		<description>perfection is a process, not an end-point. Reading this one sentence was a real big aha experience. Thank for that </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perfection is a process, not an end-point. Reading this one sentence was a real big aha experience. Thank for that </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Chambers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2007/11/15/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection.aspx#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Joey,

This is really great stuff. I agree with you more and more.

When it comes to this type of &quot;improvement&quot;, I&#039;ve found that you definately have to be willing to be very flexible. The slightest bit of arrogance or stubborness will destroy this. I try my best to listen to what everyone has to say before making any judgements, especially when it comes to programming. You have to be willing to admit that your&#039;re wrong or that you were thinking about the problem wrong and be willing to be dynamic. Any developer/consultant that is inflexible will quickly grow into a role of being stagnant which is a horrible thing in the software world.

Best of luck to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joey,</p>
<p>This is really great stuff. I agree with you more and more.</p>
<p>When it comes to this type of &#8220;improvement&#8221;, I&#8217;ve found that you definately have to be willing to be very flexible. The slightest bit of arrogance or stubborness will destroy this. I try my best to listen to what everyone has to say before making any judgements, especially when it comes to programming. You have to be willing to admit that your&#8217;re wrong or that you were thinking about the problem wrong and be willing to be dynamic. Any developer/consultant that is inflexible will quickly grow into a role of being stagnant which is a horrible thing in the software world.</p>
<p>Best of luck to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Beninghove</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Beninghove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2007/11/15/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection.aspx#comment-81</guid>
		<description>&gt; perfection is a process, not an end-point
Absolutely agree!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> perfection is a process, not an end-point<br />
Absolutely agree!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bellware</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joeybeninghove/2007/11/16/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Bellware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joeydotnet/archive/2007/11/15/random-thoughts-on-humility-and-perfection.aspx#comment-80</guid>
		<description>&gt; perfection is unachievable

Perfection is achievable once you realize that perfection is a process, not an end-point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> perfection is unachievable</p>
<p>Perfection is achievable once you realize that perfection is a process, not an end-point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
