Comments on: Ruby and Rake as an executable http://lostechies.com/johnteague/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable/ Wed, 08 May 2013 18:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: jcteague http://lostechies.com/johnteague/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable/#comment-61 jcteague Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:34:37 +0000 /blogs/johnteague/archive/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable.aspx#comment-61 yes, we're using some of that and what is in the fubuMVC rake scripts yes, we’re using some of that and what is in the fubuMVC rake scripts

]]> By: Peter Mounce http://lostechies.com/johnteague/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable/#comment-60 Peter Mounce Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:44:19 +0000 /blogs/johnteague/archive/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable.aspx#comment-60 Now _that_ sounds useful! You might also be interested in rake-dotnet...? http://github.com/petemounce/rake-dotnet Now _that_ sounds useful!

You might also be interested in rake-dotnet…? http://github.com/petemounce/rake-dotnet

]]> By: jcteague http://lostechies.com/johnteague/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable/#comment-59 jcteague Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:08:07 +0000 /blogs/johnteague/archive/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable.aspx#comment-59 Believe me, I am looking forward to IronRuby as much as any other .Net Ruby wannabe. But, unless it is deployable as a dll (which it should), you will still have the problem of including IronRuby inside your tools folder in your project. Having a completely self-contained project with dependencies is very important. It's what keeps your automation going. We'll see!! Believe me, I am looking forward to IronRuby as much as any other .Net Ruby wannabe. But, unless it is deployable as a dll (which it should), you will still have the problem of including IronRuby inside your tools folder in your project.

Having a completely self-contained project with dependencies is very important. It’s what keeps your automation going.

We’ll see!!

]]> By: mendicant http://lostechies.com/johnteague/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable/#comment-58 mendicant Fri, 12 Jun 2009 20:14:58 +0000 /blogs/johnteague/archive/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable.aspx#comment-58 ANother thing to keep in mind is that IronRuby seems to be coming pretty fast, and I bet that if you can run Rails on IronRuby that you'll be able to run Rake. Then you can have your .Net spin :D ANother thing to keep in mind is that IronRuby seems to be coming pretty fast, and I bet that if you can run Rails on IronRuby that you’ll be able to run Rake. Then you can have your .Net spin :D

]]> By: jcteague http://lostechies.com/johnteague/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable/#comment-57 jcteague Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:40:50 +0000 /blogs/johnteague/archive/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable.aspx#comment-57 You should leave this comment on Stephen's blog. I haven't played with it. But from he has told me, yes this is the full version of rails. From his description, you install or gem everything you need and then run the allinoneruby script to create the executable You should leave this comment on Stephen’s blog. I haven’t played with it. But from he has told me, yes this is the full version of rails. From his description, you install or gem everything you need and then run the allinoneruby script to create the executable

]]> By: Ryan Kelley http://lostechies.com/johnteague/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable/#comment-56 Ryan Kelley Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:14:21 +0000 /blogs/johnteague/archive/2009/06/10/ruby-and-rake-as-an-executable.aspx#comment-56 Is this a full featured version of Ruby? We are using Ruby and rake for build tasks only, but we have some fairly complex stuff in our rake scripts, such as XML manipulation, and interfacing with various external system utils. Is this still possible with the self contained version? Is this a full featured version of Ruby? We are using Ruby and rake for build tasks only, but we have some fairly complex stuff in our rake scripts, such as XML manipulation, and interfacing with various external system utils. Is this still possible with the self contained version?

]]>