<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learning to Speak with a LISP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2008/08/29/learning-to-speak-with-a-lisp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2008/08/29/learning-to-speak-with-a-lisp/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Alpert</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2008/08/29/learning-to-speak-with-a-lisp/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>David Alpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joshua_lockwood/archive/2008/08/29/learning-to-speak-with-a-lisp.aspx#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I also studied LISP in a survey of programming languages class back in university.  

Havn&#039;t seen it in years, but the concepts of functional programming, freedom from side-effects, and immutable variables have certainly come in handy - most notably when warping (not a typo) my mind around XSLT.

Clearly this LISP and other flavours of functional languages have somewhat to offer in terms of expanding your mind.

The more i learn/read/explore .NET architecture best practices, for example, the more i see the side-effect-free principle being expressed in TDD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also studied LISP in a survey of programming languages class back in university.  </p>
<p>Havn&#8217;t seen it in years, but the concepts of functional programming, freedom from side-effects, and immutable variables have certainly come in handy &#8211; most notably when warping (not a typo) my mind around XSLT.</p>
<p>Clearly this LISP and other flavours of functional languages have somewhat to offer in terms of expanding your mind.</p>
<p>The more i learn/read/explore .NET architecture best practices, for example, the more i see the side-effect-free principle being expressed in TDD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2008/08/29/learning-to-speak-with-a-lisp/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joshua_lockwood/archive/2008/08/29/learning-to-speak-with-a-lisp.aspx#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also spent some time trying my hand at LISP to get a better understanding of functional programming. I haven&#039;t gotten very far yet, but as a programmer that has spent the majority of his time writing in Microsoft languages, I wanted to expand my horizons and learn some additional languages just to get a broader perspective.

Thanks for the reminder that I&#039;m a bit behind in my LISP learning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also spent some time trying my hand at LISP to get a better understanding of functional programming. I haven&#8217;t gotten very far yet, but as a programmer that has spent the majority of his time writing in Microsoft languages, I wanted to expand my horizons and learn some additional languages just to get a broader perspective.</p>
<p>Thanks for the reminder that I&#8217;m a bit behind in my LISP learning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
