<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QUnit: Almost just what I was looking for&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2009/03/11/qunit-amost-just-what-i-was-looking-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2009/03/11/qunit-amost-just-what-i-was-looking-for/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlockwood</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2009/03/11/qunit-amost-just-what-i-was-looking-for/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>jlockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joshua_lockwood/archive/2009/03/11/qunit-amost-just-what-i-was-looking-for.aspx#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Yeah, heard of screw unit...just haven&#039;t played with it much.  I looked at the link and they look pretty similar syntax wise.  As far as the finer syntactic details...I guess I&#039;m not too picky.  In fact, I believe that if you can crank out JavaScript code without complaint then you&#039;ve probably already developed a super-human strength to ignore syntax.  I love JavaScript as a language, but the syntax itself is wonky (for instance, I hate the keyword &#039;function&#039;).  

Thanks for the link though...I&#039;ll probably look at it again.  AgileJoe has been pitching it to me for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, heard of screw unit&#8230;just haven&#8217;t played with it much.  I looked at the link and they look pretty similar syntax wise.  As far as the finer syntactic details&#8230;I guess I&#8217;m not too picky.  In fact, I believe that if you can crank out JavaScript code without complaint then you&#8217;ve probably already developed a super-human strength to ignore syntax.  I love JavaScript as a language, but the syntax itself is wonky (for instance, I hate the keyword &#8216;function&#8217;).  </p>
<p>Thanks for the link though&#8230;I&#8217;ll probably look at it again.  AgileJoe has been pitching it to me for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: len smith</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/joshualockwood/2009/03/11/qunit-amost-just-what-i-was-looking-for/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>len smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/joshua_lockwood/archive/2009/03/11/qunit-amost-just-what-i-was-looking-for.aspx#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I used to use qunit, but I&#039;m a recent screw-unit convert.

http://github.com/ignu/screw-unit/blob/282113602cea68e24a52299d0b5b9d8a7a5781eb/spec/mock_spec.js
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use qunit, but I&#8217;m a recent screw-unit convert.</p>
<p><a href="http://github.com/ignu/screw-unit/blob/282113602cea68e24a52299d0b5b9d8a7a5781eb/spec/mock_spec.js" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/ignu/screw-unit/blob/282113602cea68e24a52299d0b5b9d8a7a5781eb/spec/mock_spec.js</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
