<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refactoring with Iterators: Prime Factors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/keithdahlby/2009/09/30/refactoring-with-iterators-prime-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/keithdahlby/2009/09/30/refactoring-with-iterators-prime-factors/</link>
	<description>Git, .NET and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Dahlby</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/keithdahlby/2009/09/30/refactoring-with-iterators-prime-factors/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Dahlby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/dahlbyk/archive/2009/09/30/refactoring-with-iterators-prime-factors.aspx#comment-12</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s certainly true. For some reason I just don&#039;t think to use for if the loop is infinite. But you do save 2 lines, so I guess it&#039;s better. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s certainly true. For some reason I just don&#8217;t think to use for if the loop is infinite. But you do save 2 lines, so I guess it&#8217;s better. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BW</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/keithdahlby/2009/09/30/refactoring-with-iterators-prime-factors/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>BW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/dahlbyk/archive/2009/09/30/refactoring-with-iterators-prime-factors.aspx#comment-11</guid>
		<description>In the optimization at the end I would have used a for loop. Neither here nor there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the optimization at the end I would have used a for loop. Neither here nor there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
