Comments on: A philosophical discussion about Inversion of Control frameworks http://lostechies.com/marcusbratton/2010/01/10/a-philosophical-discussion-about-inversion-of-control-frameworks/ Just another LosTechies site Mon, 07 May 2012 07:05:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: banq http://lostechies.com/marcusbratton/2010/01/10/a-philosophical-discussion-about-inversion-of-control-frameworks/#comment-50 banq Fri, 15 Jan 2010 03:38:48 +0000 /blogs/marcus_bratton/archive/2010/01/10/a-philosophical-discussion-about-inversion-of-control-frameworks.aspx#comment-50 > I want them decoupled completely My IoC Framework is . include framework itself, please refer:https://jdon.dev.java.net/ this framework 's core is based in picocontainer 1.1, any components can be replaced by xml. > I want them decoupled completely
My IoC Framework is . include framework itself, please refer:https://jdon.dev.java.net/

this framework ‘s core is based in picocontainer 1.1, any components can be replaced by xml.

]]> By: mbratton http://lostechies.com/marcusbratton/2010/01/10/a-philosophical-discussion-about-inversion-of-control-frameworks/#comment-49 mbratton Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:34:46 +0000 /blogs/marcus_bratton/archive/2010/01/10/a-philosophical-discussion-about-inversion-of-control-frameworks.aspx#comment-49 Man, I wish that's how it was where I work. I can't tell you the number of references to IKernel and IWindsorContainer that litter our codebase. Man, I wish that’s how it was where I work. I can’t tell you the number of references to IKernel and IWindsorContainer that litter our codebase.

]]> By: Rinat Abdullin http://lostechies.com/marcusbratton/2010/01/10/a-philosophical-discussion-about-inversion-of-control-frameworks/#comment-48 Rinat Abdullin Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:14:25 +0000 /blogs/marcus_bratton/archive/2010/01/10/a-philosophical-discussion-about-inversion-of-control-frameworks.aspx#comment-48 I wonder, who cares about decoupling an IoC container from the rest of the code, when they touch only in config and host initialization sections anyway. I wonder, who cares about decoupling an IoC container from the rest of the code, when they touch only in config and host initialization sections anyway.

]]>