<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Fluent NHibernate With Legacy Databases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/rodpaddock/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/rodpaddock/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Paddock</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/rodpaddock/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Paddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 15:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/rodpaddock/archive/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases.aspx#comment-12</guid>
		<description>@cloggins The normal NHibernate workflow does not normally  specify the Schema() and Table() attributes on a mapping. These are derived from the model. Generally these attributes are only used when accessing pre-existing databases (aka legacy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@cloggins The normal NHibernate workflow does not normally  specify the Schema() and Table() attributes on a mapping. These are derived from the model. Generally these attributes are only used when accessing pre-existing databases (aka legacy)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cloggins</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/rodpaddock/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>cloggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 01:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/rodpaddock/archive/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases.aspx#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Am I missing something? Where&#039;s the legacy stuff. As best I can tell, this is just basic &#039;use Fluent NHibernate to connect to a database&#039; stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I missing something? Where&#8217;s the legacy stuff. As best I can tell, this is just basic &#8216;use Fluent NHibernate to connect to a database&#8217; stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Paddock</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/rodpaddock/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Paddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/rodpaddock/archive/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases.aspx#comment-10</guid>
		<description>@Yonkz. Thanks for the heads up on that. I forgot about linked servers. Proably because we tried using linked servers in the past and were never happy with the results. Too much flakieness IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yonkz. Thanks for the heads up on that. I forgot about linked servers. Proably because we tried using linked servers in the past and were never happy with the results. Too much flakieness IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yonkz</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/rodpaddock/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Yonkz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/rodpaddock/archive/2010/06/29/using-fluent-nhibernate-with-legacy-databases.aspx#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I successfully use the .Schema() method to use two different SQL servers, but the catch is that they need to be set up as Linked servers.  This creates some other interesting issues surrounding MSDTC, and forces you to have two separate instances of SQL Server running in your development environments, due to the fact that Microsoft no longer supports distributed transactions in a loop back scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I successfully use the .Schema() method to use two different SQL servers, but the catch is that they need to be set up as Linked servers.  This creates some other interesting issues surrounding MSDTC, and forces you to have two separate instances of SQL Server running in your development environments, due to the fact that Microsoft no longer supports distributed transactions in a loop back scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
