<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UX: Color is only meaningful if it&#8217;s different</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irné Barnard</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Irné Barnard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-119</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s even an issue with the &quot;word change&quot;. E.g. a light switch with the On/Off idea is pretty self explanatory.

However, a button to click would usually contain a word defining the action when clicking on the button. So does a button showing &quot;On&quot; mean it is already turned on, or does it mean it will turn on after you&#039;ve clicked it?

I&#039;m in agreement that some visual state for the button gives more UI feedback. It need not be a colour though. The Checkbox idea shows pretty clearly an On/Off state. If you want something to work for both the mind-reading-impared (Ha!) as well as the colour blind, then your best bet is not to focus so much on colour or words, but rather contrast:

I.e. give the button a different surround when on, or give it a higher contrasting backgound, or as in some apps: make the On state into a depressed look.

There&#039;s obviously nothing stopping you from combining 2 methods to enhance the &quot;feature&quot; though. And IMO that&#039;s always a better idea than to simply expect the user to know what you (as the developer) intended for  button with a particular state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s even an issue with the &#8220;word change&#8221;. E.g. a light switch with the On/Off idea is pretty self explanatory.</p>
<p>However, a button to click would usually contain a word defining the action when clicking on the button. So does a button showing &#8220;On&#8221; mean it is already turned on, or does it mean it will turn on after you&#8217;ve clicked it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in agreement that some visual state for the button gives more UI feedback. It need not be a colour though. The Checkbox idea shows pretty clearly an On/Off state. If you want something to work for both the mind-reading-impared (Ha!) as well as the colour blind, then your best bet is not to focus so much on colour or words, but rather contrast:</p>
<p>I.e. give the button a different surround when on, or give it a higher contrasting backgound, or as in some apps: make the On state into a depressed look.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s obviously nothing stopping you from combining 2 methods to enhance the &#8220;feature&#8221; though. And IMO that&#8217;s always a better idea than to simply expect the user to know what you (as the developer) intended for  button with a particular state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elzalem</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>elzalem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-118</guid>
		<description>+1 for imgur </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 for imgur </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr T</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Sensitive  Sharable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensitive  Sharable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nzr</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Nzr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Sensitive  Safe
Internal  External
Public  Private</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensitive  Safe<br />
Internal  External<br />
Public  Private</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandewinder</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>brandewinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-114</guid>
		<description>As a member of the color blind minority, thank you! Standard color codes often don&#039;t work at all for me, having the ability to redefine color mappings is a very valuable feature for me. One typical case is test runners - Red, Orange/Yellow and Green are pretty bad defaults for the color blind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of the color blind minority, thank you! Standard color codes often don&#8217;t work at all for me, having the ability to redefine color mappings is a very valuable feature for me. One typical case is test runners &#8211; Red, Orange/Yellow and Green are pretty bad defaults for the color blind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rauhr</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Rauhr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-113</guid>
		<description>You bring up a very good point. 

This feature evolved from a previous feature where the internal status was represented by a simple word with a colored background.

After we added that our customers wanted the ability to change the internal status after the log was created (which previous could on be set when you created it)

None of our usability tests turned out negative, when it came down to it the crux of the issue was that we couldn&#039;t settle on the inverse language for the &quot;off&quot; state.

Sensitive  [Insensitive] [Not Sensitive] [Unsensitive] [Safe to view] ...
Internal  [Not Internal] [Safe] [External] ... 
Public  [Private] [Not Public] ...

We got a lot of positive feedback after we shipped, but I&#039;d love to revisit this I just haven&#039;t come up with a better alternative yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up a very good point. </p>
<p>This feature evolved from a previous feature where the internal status was represented by a simple word with a colored background.</p>
<p>After we added that our customers wanted the ability to change the internal status after the log was created (which previous could on be set when you created it)</p>
<p>None of our usability tests turned out negative, when it came down to it the crux of the issue was that we couldn&#8217;t settle on the inverse language for the &#8220;off&#8221; state.</p>
<p>Sensitive  [Insensitive] [Not Sensitive] [Unsensitive] [Safe to view] &#8230;<br />
Internal  [Not Internal] [Safe] [External] &#8230; <br />
Public  [Private] [Not Public] &#8230;</p>
<p>We got a lot of positive feedback after we shipped, but I&#8217;d love to revisit this I just haven&#8217;t come up with a better alternative yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sodablue</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>sodablue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-112</guid>
		<description>So look at a real light switch on the wall.  As long as it&#039;s not  3-way, the switch has words on it that indicate ON and OFF.  When you flip the switch up, the OFF is hidden by the plate and now you can only see the word ON.

UI controls should not simply change the color, they should change the way it is represented.  A checkbox clearly shows something is checked.  In the case of a switch control the color helps as a visual cue, but the word should change as well.  Just like on the real lightswitch on the wall.

The iPad/iPhone switches do this, change the word from OFF to ON as well as change the color.

I find color changes by themselves confusing and I&#039;m not color blind.  It takes a lot of experience working with the UI before you realize the developers choose orange to represent on.  When you&#039;re neck deep in the app you don&#039;t realize this.

I think that&#039;s why it&#039;s also important to do usability tests by showing screenshots to someone not familiar with the app and ask them what it means, or what they&#039;d click if they wanted to do something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So look at a real light switch on the wall.  As long as it&#8217;s not  3-way, the switch has words on it that indicate ON and OFF.  When you flip the switch up, the OFF is hidden by the plate and now you can only see the word ON.</p>
<p>UI controls should not simply change the color, they should change the way it is represented.  A checkbox clearly shows something is checked.  In the case of a switch control the color helps as a visual cue, but the word should change as well.  Just like on the real lightswitch on the wall.</p>
<p>The iPad/iPhone switches do this, change the word from OFF to ON as well as change the color.</p>
<p>I find color changes by themselves confusing and I&#8217;m not color blind.  It takes a lot of experience working with the UI before you realize the developers choose orange to represent on.  When you&#8217;re neck deep in the app you don&#8217;t realize this.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s also important to do usability tests by showing screenshots to someone not familiar with the app and ask them what it means, or what they&#8217;d click if they wanted to do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Myers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-111</guid>
		<description>If another employee is whistleblowing about their manager, for example. In US Federal Law, they are protected and their anonymity must be protected by the employer.  That&#039;s just one of many examples where an employee is not entitled to see what&#039;s being said about them.

In fact, in most cases, they are not entitled to private conversations, so that is usually the default for most of our customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If another employee is whistleblowing about their manager, for example. In US Federal Law, they are protected and their anonymity must be protected by the employer.  That&#8217;s just one of many examples where an employee is not entitled to see what&#8217;s being said about them.</p>
<p>In fact, in most cases, they are not entitled to private conversations, so that is usually the default for most of our customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rauhr</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Rauhr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Haha, that wasn&#039;t intentional... The title of the case is &quot;Burt sexually harassed me at the Christmas party&quot;

Where the concerning employee is Burt Reynolds... I have a huge test data suite involving characters from Smokey and the Bandit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, that wasn&#8217;t intentional&#8230; The title of the case is &#8220;Burt sexually harassed me at the Christmas party&#8221;</p>
<p>Where the concerning employee is Burt Reynolds&#8230; I have a huge test data suite involving characters from Smokey and the Bandit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bristol</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/2012/10/31/ux-color-is-only-meaning/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bristol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lostechies.com/ryanrauh/?p=180#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Probably OT, but under what circumstances would an HR rep not want a comment/email seen by an employee?  I am assuming that these cases are things like employee complaints, worker&#039;s comp, etc... and that such a feature could allow the company to hide information that the employee may have a legal right to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably OT, but under what circumstances would an HR rep not want a comment/email seen by an employee?  I am assuming that these cases are things like employee complaints, worker&#8217;s comp, etc&#8230; and that such a feature could allow the company to hide information that the employee may have a legal right to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
