<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Choosing a JavaScript Framework</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anydiem</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Anydiem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework.aspx#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Microsoft&#039;s Ajax framework ( http://asp.net/ajax/ ) includes a client javascript framework; also, the Volta project seems to be trying to make writing javascript unneccesary. Would be cool to see these added into the comparison at some future date :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft&#8217;s Ajax framework ( <a href="http://asp.net/ajax/" rel="nofollow">http://asp.net/ajax/</a> ) includes a client javascript framework; also, the Volta project seems to be trying to make writing javascript unneccesary. Would be cool to see these added into the comparison at some future date <img src='http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Ocampo</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Ocampo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework.aspx#comment-189</guid>
		<description>You stole my thunder bro..LOL..   Very informative post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You stole my thunder bro..LOL..   Very informative post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2007/12/16/choosing-a-javascript-framework.aspx#comment-188</guid>
		<description>I have been using jQuery heavily on my current project. Also I am using the proto/Scriptaculous set. I&#039;ve found jquery plugins to be buggy even in their offical UI package...plus the ajax calls seem slower than prototype. Apart from this, jquery is more intuitive I think and like you said community involvement seems more organized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using jQuery heavily on my current project. Also I am using the proto/Scriptaculous set. I&#8217;ve found jquery plugins to be buggy even in their offical UI package&#8230;plus the ajax calls seem slower than prototype. Apart from this, jquery is more intuitive I think and like you said community involvement seems more organized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
