Comments on: Refactoring towards deeper insight

By: clpeeyrmo

clpeeyrmo — Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:05:40 +0000

qUzcCK wrqseiyprrfn, [url=http://exxxfshwuukh.com/]exxxfshwuukh[/url], [link=http://onjrbjtnbzbi.com/]onjrbjtnbzbi[/link], http://fvtxccevkggo.com/

By: ybodlte

ybodlte — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:53:57 +0000

jo4ZVn dzrxmlyndytj, [url=http://cajamfycuhql.com/]cajamfycuhql[/url], [link=http://mzmyurzkahuu.com/]mzmyurzkahuu[/link], http://tdhmjlosmepl.com/

By: schambers

schambers — Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:01:51 +0000

@joe,

There is definately instances where it is not applicable. Usually, applications with small/no core domain aren’t applicable for DDD. There are other instances, but this is usually a good rule to follow.

There has been several applications I have built that I steer away from DDD for this reason.

Once you decide to use DDD for the basis of a domain model you incur a bit of overhead in using it, thus it should be initially discussed if there is a good domain language/model to utilize DDD with.

By: joe

joe — Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:16:37 +0000

I see an awful lot of chatter about DDD and it seems like every other .net blogger practices it. But in every interview I read read or watch with Eric Evans, he stresses that it is not always the route to take. Since you asked for questions — when is DDD overkill and at which point does it produce benefits?

By: Rob

Rob — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:07:23 +0000

Would love to see you do the DDD talk at Tallahassee Code Camp!
http://capitalcitydotnet.net/dotnetnuke/CodeCampIV/tabid/64/Default.aspx