<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refactoring Day 6 : Push Down Field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2009/08/06/refactoring-day-6-push-down-field/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2009/08/06/refactoring-day-6-push-down-field/</link>
	<description>Just another LosTechies site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 07:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: schambers</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2009/08/06/refactoring-day-6-push-down-field/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>schambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2009/08/06/refactoring-day-6-push-down-field.aspx#comment-384</guid>
		<description>There isn&#039;t any plagiarism occuring because as you can see from the link at the bottom of the article that points to: http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2009/08/01/31-days-of-refactoring.aspx; I give credit to Martin Fowler and other sources of where these refactorings come from. This one was clearly outlined by Fowler in his Refactoring book.

Furthermore, I don&#039;t see how you could have a &quot;value add&quot; to something as simple as Pushing a field down into a subclass. I suppose I have more wording compared to the original published refactoring by Fowler which only contains a class diagram.

Just for clarification and completeness if you don&#039;t want to follow the link to the original article which gives credit to Fowler here is the original refactoring published by Martin Fowler: http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/pushDownField.html

I don&#039;t take lightly to being accused of plagiarism. I am NOT claiming ownership over any of these refactorings, nor did I ever state that they are my idea. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t any plagiarism occuring because as you can see from the link at the bottom of the article that points to: <a href="http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2009/08/01/31-days-of-refactoring.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.lostechies.com/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2009/08/01/31-days-of-refactoring.aspx</a>; I give credit to Martin Fowler and other sources of where these refactorings come from. This one was clearly outlined by Fowler in his Refactoring book.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I don&#8217;t see how you could have a &#8220;value add&#8221; to something as simple as Pushing a field down into a subclass. I suppose I have more wording compared to the original published refactoring by Fowler which only contains a class diagram.</p>
<p>Just for clarification and completeness if you don&#8217;t want to follow the link to the original article which gives credit to Fowler here is the original refactoring published by Martin Fowler: <a href="http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/pushDownField.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/pushDownField.html</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t take lightly to being accused of plagiarism. I am NOT claiming ownership over any of these refactorings, nor did I ever state that they are my idea. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/seanchambers/2009/08/06/refactoring-day-6-push-down-field/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 22:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sean_chambers/archive/2009/08/06/refactoring-day-6-push-down-field.aspx#comment-383</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t there some copyright being infringed here? Or at least plagiarism. Where is the value add? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t there some copyright being infringed here? Or at least plagiarism. Where is the value add? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
