<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Simple Steps to Improve Your Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/sharoncichelli/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/sharoncichelli/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing/</link>
	<description>Sharon Cichelli&#039;s blog about software, development, teams, and projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 03:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phat</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/sharoncichelli/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>phat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sharoncichelli/archive/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing.aspx#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Decorating writing with useless ornaments also consumes the space and time that should be invested in offering context and subtext.

Many technical writers assume too much from their readers, ignoring an opportunity to offer the foundation or underlying question that triggered a commentary or article.  Writers invite misunderstanding unless they establish context before content.

The casual &quot;write like you speak&quot; confusion is amplified by the &quot;write like you think&quot; failure.  Techies must learn to think more clearly and, if not, at least write like you do.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decorating writing with useless ornaments also consumes the space and time that should be invested in offering context and subtext.</p>
<p>Many technical writers assume too much from their readers, ignoring an opportunity to offer the foundation or underlying question that triggered a commentary or article.  Writers invite misunderstanding unless they establish context before content.</p>
<p>The casual &#8220;write like you speak&#8221; confusion is amplified by the &#8220;write like you think&#8221; failure.  Techies must learn to think more clearly and, if not, at least write like you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fynnbob</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/sharoncichelli/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Fynnbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sharoncichelli/archive/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing.aspx#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Actually, your second to last paragraph is something that irks me: repeating the same point in slightly different ways to try and better drive home a point. Don&#039;t worry, I already got the point. You could have excavated a big chunk of text by ending that paragraph with &quot;Good editing is liberating.&quot; I definitely agree with that.

Good article and I hope lots of people read it. I would also add that writers should challenge themselves to be as succinct as possible. Everyone would appreciate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, your second to last paragraph is something that irks me: repeating the same point in slightly different ways to try and better drive home a point. Don&#8217;t worry, I already got the point. You could have excavated a big chunk of text by ending that paragraph with &#8220;Good editing is liberating.&#8221; I definitely agree with that.</p>
<p>Good article and I hope lots of people read it. I would also add that writers should challenge themselves to be as succinct as possible. Everyone would appreciate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Baley</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/sharoncichelli/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Baley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sharoncichelli/archive/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing.aspx#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Yeah, &quot;definitely&quot; is a personal pet peeve mostly because it&#039;s so often misspelled. Not a fan of &quot;just&quot; either.

Another variation that is hard to read: &quot;what it is&quot; or &quot;all it is&quot;, because it usually leads to phrases like &quot;what it is is&quot; and &quot;all it is is&quot;.

Now that I really think about it, we could basically do away with adverbs altogether...essentially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, &#8220;definitely&#8221; is a personal pet peeve mostly because it&#8217;s so often misspelled. Not a fan of &#8220;just&#8221; either.</p>
<p>Another variation that is hard to read: &#8220;what it is&#8221; or &#8220;all it is&#8221;, because it usually leads to phrases like &#8220;what it is is&#8221; and &#8220;all it is is&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now that I really think about it, we could basically do away with adverbs altogether&#8230;essentially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/sharoncichelli/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sharoncichelli/archive/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing.aspx#comment-33</guid>
		<description>What if X is basically Y? :)

&quot;Definitely&quot; is another one, also people using the &quot;very&quot; or &quot;so&quot; with &quot;unique&quot; drives me bonkers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if X is basically Y? :)</p>
<p>&#8220;Definitely&#8221; is another one, also people using the &#8220;very&#8221; or &#8220;so&#8221; with &#8220;unique&#8221; drives me bonkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/sharoncichelli/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 18:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/sharoncichelli/archive/2010/08/30/three-simple-steps-to-improve-your-writing.aspx#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also include &quot;actually&quot; in the list of words to replace with nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also include &#8220;actually&#8221; in the list of words to replace with nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
