<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why a culture of quality matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/</link>
	<description>Precious chunks of wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Anderson</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/stevedonie/archive/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters.aspx#comment-28</guid>
		<description>The text of the dialog is:

You have acknowledge the terms of the &lt;FONT size=4&gt;Plan Documents, Certificates of Coverage, Summary Plan Descriptions&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt; polcy.  Click OK to continue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text of the dialog is:</p>
<p>You have acknowledge the terms of the <font size=4>Plan Documents, Certificates of Coverage, Summary Plan Descriptions&lt;/FONT&gt;</font> polcy.  Click OK to continue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott C Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott C Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/stevedonie/archive/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters.aspx#comment-27</guid>
		<description>as an aside...I can&#039;t use the ADP portal at all. programmer fail. quality fail. service fail. You&#039;re absolutely right. This is why it matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as an aside&#8230;I can&#8217;t use the ADP portal at all. programmer fail. quality fail. service fail. You&#8217;re absolutely right. This is why it matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Alexander</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 07:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/stevedonie/archive/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters.aspx#comment-26</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been using ADP for a couple years now and I can tell every time my wife goes on to submit payroll due to the bellowing &quot;OMG Why does it do this every time!&quot; from the other room. Just about anything other than basic workflow opertions just don&#039;t work. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been using ADP for a couple years now and I can tell every time my wife goes on to submit payroll due to the bellowing &#8220;OMG Why does it do this every time!&#8221; from the other room. Just about anything other than basic workflow opertions just don&#8217;t work. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio Pereira</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/stevedonie/archive/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters.aspx#comment-25</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually amazed that they have never screwed up my paychecks (knock on wood.) Maybe they&#039;re still running of off the trusty old excel spreadsheet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually amazed that they have never screwed up my paychecks (knock on wood.) Maybe they&#8217;re still running of off the trusty old excel spreadsheet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/stevedonie/archive/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters.aspx#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to add that PayChex is no better.  It&#039;s atrocious.  In addition to their tiny fonts, and general Firefox incompatibility, their site insists on spawning a new browser window for every click.  It seems like they cobbled together their service by acquiring multiple products, so every one behaves differently and requires some kind of single-sign-on passthrough.

Their login sequence is great.  First, pick from a dropdown list indicating which service you need (FSA, retirement, etc).  You&#039;re redirected to their &quot;redesigned login page&quot; whereby a div which you&#039;ve seen dozens of times before welcomes you to logging in and hides the login controls until you dismiss it.  The username and password fields lose focus when you alt-tab to your password database program, so all auto-type capabilities are off the table.  So you type your username, password, and pick that all-important login graphic.  Next is the &quot;Secret Question&quot; validation.  Then they insist on wasting yet another page to tell you that THIS is your login graphic, and you MUST remember it to log in next time!  Well duh, I wouldn&#039;t very well be reading this if I didn&#039;t already recognize it.  Finally, remember that dropdown from which you chose which service you wanted?  Well Paychex doesn&#039;t.  So go ahead and pick from the menu and spawn yourself another browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to add that PayChex is no better.  It&#8217;s atrocious.  In addition to their tiny fonts, and general Firefox incompatibility, their site insists on spawning a new browser window for every click.  It seems like they cobbled together their service by acquiring multiple products, so every one behaves differently and requires some kind of single-sign-on passthrough.</p>
<p>Their login sequence is great.  First, pick from a dropdown list indicating which service you need (FSA, retirement, etc).  You&#8217;re redirected to their &#8220;redesigned login page&#8221; whereby a div which you&#8217;ve seen dozens of times before welcomes you to logging in and hides the login controls until you dismiss it.  The username and password fields lose focus when you alt-tab to your password database program, so all auto-type capabilities are off the table.  So you type your username, password, and pick that all-important login graphic.  Next is the &#8220;Secret Question&#8221; validation.  Then they insist on wasting yet another page to tell you that THIS is your login graphic, and you MUST remember it to log in next time!  Well duh, I wouldn&#8217;t very well be reading this if I didn&#8217;t already recognize it.  Finally, remember that dropdown from which you chose which service you wanted?  Well Paychex doesn&#8217;t.  So go ahead and pick from the menu and spawn yourself another browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Paddock</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Paddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/stevedonie/archive/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters.aspx#comment-23</guid>
		<description>ADP software is notoriously bad. From a Usability standpoint as well as all APIs for importing data into the application

Which leads to the why of it all? Well the why is that ADP is a virtual monopoly on that stuff. ADP and PayChex are two of the biggest payroll companies in existance. 

When you have no competition you could really give a crap about experience correct ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADP software is notoriously bad. From a Usability standpoint as well as all APIs for importing data into the application</p>
<p>Which leads to the why of it all? Well the why is that ADP is a virtual monopoly on that stuff. ADP and PayChex are two of the biggest payroll companies in existance. </p>
<p>When you have no competition you could really give a crap about experience correct ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://lostechies.com/stevedonie/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blogs/stevedonie/archive/2009/04/27/why-a-culture-of-quality-matters.aspx#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I remember years ago the company I worked with moved from a macro&#039;d up Spreadsheet to an intranet version of our timesheet.  Our timesheet wasn&#039;t all that complicated, but for some reason the company that created the intranet application used some sort of wizard to create it instead of actually coding it.  The result was a single webpage of over 250,000 lines of code.  In 2009 that would be a joke, back in 1999 when offshore sites were connected via a 64k line, it all but ground our business to a halt.

The moral to the story?  For some reason, every HR program I have ever seen has been horrible from a technical standpoint, especially useability.  Frankly, I&#039;m surprised nobody has come in and undercut the market with a good product consider most HR programs also complete bloatware that have ridiculous hardware requirements.

Most financial and accounting software is similar in this regards, but from what I understand they are improving.  The problem is, most companies feel they are paying for the importance is in the back end processes, not the entire software package.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember years ago the company I worked with moved from a macro&#8217;d up Spreadsheet to an intranet version of our timesheet.  Our timesheet wasn&#8217;t all that complicated, but for some reason the company that created the intranet application used some sort of wizard to create it instead of actually coding it.  The result was a single webpage of over 250,000 lines of code.  In 2009 that would be a joke, back in 1999 when offshore sites were connected via a 64k line, it all but ground our business to a halt.</p>
<p>The moral to the story?  For some reason, every HR program I have ever seen has been horrible from a technical standpoint, especially useability.  Frankly, I&#8217;m surprised nobody has come in and undercut the market with a good product consider most HR programs also complete bloatware that have ridiculous hardware requirements.</p>
<p>Most financial and accounting software is similar in this regards, but from what I understand they are improving.  The problem is, most companies feel they are paying for the importance is in the back end processes, not the entire software package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
