DOM Selection Is Expensive
If you didn’t know this already, DOM selection is expensive. So expensive, in fact, that it should be avoided whenever possible. Of course avoiding it entirely is not likely as we need DOM selection to handle events, update the UI, and more. There’s a huge performance impact on having to constantly select a <script> tag from the DOM when you need a template, though. See this JSPerf that I wrote which illustrates the difference.
If you’re storing templates in a script tag, don’t access that DOM element more than once. After all, you’re not expecting the contents of the template to change. Only the data that is rendered in to the template changes.
Simple Template Caching
The easiest way of storing a template is to use the DOM selector as a key, and the template contents as a value. Check for the existence of that key on an object, and if it exists use that. If it doesn’t exist, load it:
One of the commenters in the thread of discussion liked the test I put together but thought it could be done better, still. He updated it to show cached vs non-cached and pre-compiled vs non-pre-compiled templates.
Clearly, pre-compiling your templates is important. So let’s update our TemplateCache to pre-compile the templates for us (assuming we’re using underscore.js):
Template Cache Built In To Backbone.Marionette
Of course you saw this part coming, right? I’ve got a much more robust version of the above template caching already available in Backbone.Marionette. It defaults to using underscore.js as it’s template engine, but that’s really easy to change. See the documentation for some examples on how to do that.
But even if you’re not using Backbone or Backbone.Marionette, you need to take advantage of the performance improvements that your application will see, by only selecting something from the DOM once, and by pre-compiling and caching any templates that you’re using.
Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.