I’ve written hundreds of tests, read dozens
of articles and listened to several presentations on unit testing, but
until recently had never actually read a book dedicated to the subject.
In reviewing my options, I was told repeatedly that I should start with Pragmatic
Unit Testing (In C# with NUnit) from The Pragmatic Programmers,
part of the three-volume Pragmatic Starter Kit. In the context of that
starter kit, I found the book to be an excellent introduction to unit
testing; however, a developer with sufficient experience could probably
get by with a quick glance over the summary provided as Appendix C
(which is available
But before I get into the book, let me start by applauding the idea
of the Pragmatic Starter Kit. As I entered industry after receiving my
degrees in Computer Engineering and Computer Science, it became clear
that I was terribly unprepared for building quality software. Academia
provided a solid foundation of theory and some (basic) techniques to
structure code (OO, FP, etc), but provided precious little guidance for
scaling projects beyond a few thousands lines of code. Version control
was given one lecture and a trivial assignment (in CVS), the unit
testing lecture did little to convince me that it actually had value,
and automated testing was never even mentioned (in fact, build processes
in general were scarcely discussed). These are the gaps that the
Pragmatic Starter Kit aims to fill with practical advice from the field,
and if Pragmatic Unit Testing is any indication the entire
series should be required reading for new graduates (or even sophomores,
As one would expect from an introductory volume, the book begins with
an excellent overview (PDF) of what
unit testing is and why it matters. There are also several pages
dedicated to rebuttals to common objections like “It takes too much time
to write the tests”, “It’s not my job to test my code”, and my personal
favorite “I’m being paid to write code, not to write tests”, which is
By that same logic, we’re not being paid to spend all day
in the debugger either. Presumably we are being paid to write working
code, and unit tests are merely a tool toward that end, in the same
fashion as an editor, an IDE, or the compiler.
Developers are a proud lot, so the emphasis on testing as a powerful
tool rather than a crutch is crucial.
Chapters 2 and 3 follow up with an introduction to testing with
NUnit, first with a simple example and then with a closer look at
structured testing with the framework. All the usual suspects are
covered, including classic and constraint-based asserts, setup and
teardown guidance, [Category], [ExpectedException], [Ignore] and more.
The most valuable chapters to a new tester will be chapters 4 and 5.
The former provides the “Right BICEP” mnemonic to suggest what to test;
the latter takes a closer look at the “CORRECT” boundary conditions (the
B in BICEP) to test. The expanded acronyms are included in the
aforementioned summary card (PDF).
Even after you have a good handle on what to test, the mnemonics can
still serve as a handy reminder, and starting out the overviews of each
bullet are spot on. I also liked chapters 7–9, which give good guidance
on qualities of good tests and how testing can be applied effectively to
projects and to improve code, though the refactoring example was a bit
longer than it probably needed to be.
In my opinion, the weakest parts of the book were chapters 6 and 10,
on mocking and UI testing, respectively. The former starts out strong,
but gets bogged down once it starts talking about tools. The reader
would be better off skipping section 6.3 altogether in favor of a good
Rhino Mocks or Moq introduction. The discussion of UI testing, on the
other hand, covers too little on a number of topics to be of much value
other than to raise awareness that you should test all parts of the
Overall I was quite pleased with the quantity and quality of material
covered for an introductory volume, awarding four out of five donkeys.
The authors make a good argument for testing and offer sound guidance
for how to do it. However, if you’re already familiar with unit testing
you may be better off reading The Art of Unit Testing or
finding more specific material online.